Kiwi Ears Melody vs ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Kiwi Ears Melody. It ranks #912 of 1369 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $9; the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG ranks #1037, rated 3.1/5, at $9. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.

Kiwi Ears Melody vs ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG

Why pick the Kiwi Ears Melody: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 66 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: An uneven response, 2.4 dB standard deviation from target.

Why pick the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. Watch for: Treble about 2 dB above target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound sharp or tiring at higher volume.

Buy the Kiwi Ears Melody. It is rated higher for sound quality than the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG at the same price, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

Kiwi Ears Melody

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 66 against the Harman target.

Amazon eBay
9
ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG

A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.

Amazon eBay
9

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Kiwi Ears Melody ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG
Price9.009.00
Ranked#912 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones#1037 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score66 (median of 17 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)63 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.39 dB standard deviation2.93 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.81 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)+0.53 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-3.9 dB at 30 Hz)
Driver TypePlanarDynamic
Drivers1 x 12mm planar magnetic driver2 x dynamic driver (1 x 10mm bamboo fiber & silk suspension diaphragm + 1 x 6mm PU+PEEK composite diaphragm)
Impedance18 ohms32 ohms
Sensitivity102 dB105 dB/mW
Frequency Response5Hz - 40kHz20Hz - 20kHz
ConnectionWiredWired

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Kiwi Ears MelodyZHULINNIAO JINGHONGHarman target
Frequency response of the Kiwi Ears Melody and ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Kiwi Ears Melody from audioamigo, bassyalexander, boizoff, cqtek, hbb, ianfann, jaytiss, kazi, kuping-sensi, mmagtech, musicafe, practiphile, pw, soundcheck39, tonedeafmonk, vortexreviews and vsg; the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG from aftersound, hobbytalk, ianfann and pw, all via squig.link.

How Kiwi Ears Melody compares with other leading options: