Noble Audio Kublai Khan vs Lime Ears Maris

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Noble Audio Kublai Khan. It ranks #787 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.5/5, at $2,599; the Lime Ears Maris ranks #883, rated 3.4/5, and costs $2,799, so there is little reason to consider the other one.

Noble Audio Kublai Khan vs Lime Ears Maris

Why pick the Noble Audio Kublai Khan: Upper treble lifts about 2.8 dB for extra air and sparkle. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 7.7 dB low with a 9.7 dB dip near 4.4 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.

Why pick the Lime Ears Maris: A flagship with coaxial dynamic woofers, six armatures, electrostatic tweeters and bone conduction drivers, with a solid Harman score of 66 across ten measurements. The tradeoff: Treble sits about 3.7 dB below target, so it sounds dark next to its price rivals, and it measures behind the cheaper Lime Ears Terra.

Buy the Noble Audio Kublai Khan. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Lime Ears Maris and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Noble Audio Kublai Khan

Upper treble lifts about 2.8 dB for extra air and sparkle.

Bloom Audio $2,599.00 eBay
$2,599
Lime Ears Maris

A flagship with coaxial dynamic woofers, six armatures, electrostatic tweeters and bone conduction drivers, with a solid Harman score of 66 across ten measurements.

Lime Ears eBay
$2,799

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Noble Audio Kublai Khan Lime Ears Maris
Price$2,599.00$2,799
Ranked#787 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#883 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeHybridMulti-driver
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature + 1 x 10mm piezoelectric + 1 x bone conduction2 x 8mm coaxial dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 2 x electrostatic + 2 x bone conduction
Impedance15.4 ohms-
Frequency Response20Hz - 25kHz-
Harman Preference Score68 (measured by HypetheSonics, via AutoEQ)66 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.51 dB standard deviation2.33 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.42 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.97 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.8 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.6 dB at 30 Hz)
Back-Closed

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Noble Audio Kublai KhanLime Ears MarisHarman target
Frequency response of the Noble Audio Kublai Khan and Lime Ears Maris-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Noble Audio Kublai Khan from aden, bloomaudio, dchpgall and hbb; the Lime Ears Maris from aden, animagus, audioamigo, ducbloke, eliseaudio, jaytiss, koi, practiphile, pw and superreview, all via squig.link.

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Noble Audio Kublai Khan: