Lime Ears Maris vs qdc Emperor

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Lime Ears Maris. It ranks #889 of 1369 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.4/5, at $2,799; the qdc Emperor ranks #967, rated 3.3/5, and costs $2,831, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

Lime Ears Maris vs qdc Emperor

The case for the Lime Ears Maris: A flagship with coaxial dynamic woofers, six armatures, electrostatic tweeters and bone conduction drivers, with a solid Harman score of 66 across ten measurements. The tradeoff: Treble sits about 3.7 dB below target, so it sounds dark next to its price rivals, and it measures behind the cheaper Lime Ears Terra.

The case for the qdc Emperor: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. Watch for: About 3 dB less bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, which can sound thin on pop, hip hop and electronic music.

Buy the Lime Ears Maris. It is rated higher for sound quality than the qdc Emperor and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Lime Ears Maris

A flagship with coaxial dynamic woofers, six armatures, electrostatic tweeters and bone conduction drivers, with a solid Harman score of 66 across ten measurements.

Lime Ears eBay
$2,799
qdc Emperor

A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.

Elise Audio $2,831.00 eBay
$2,831

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Lime Ears Maris qdc Emperor
Price$2,799$2,831.00
Ranked#889 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones#967 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeMulti-driverTribrid
Drivers2 x 8mm coaxial dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 2 x electrostatic + 2 x bone conduction15 drivers (1 dynamic driver + 10 balanced armatures + 4 electrostatic drivers)
Harman Preference Score66 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)65 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.33 dB standard deviation2.92 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.97 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)+0.10 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.6 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.4 dB at 30 Hz)
Impedance-15 ohms
Sensitivity-106 dB SPL/mW
Frequency Response-5Hz - 70kHz

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Lime Ears Marisqdc EmperorHarman target
Frequency response of the Lime Ears Maris and qdc Emperor-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Lime Ears Maris from aden, animagus, audioamigo, ducbloke, eliseaudio, jaytiss, koi, practiphile, pw and superreview; the qdc Emperor from dchpgall, eliseaudio and sl0the, all via squig.link.

How Lime Ears Maris compares with other leading options: