Short answer: the Moondrop Starfield 2, if you are buying new. The Moondrop Starfield ranks higher than the Moondrop Starfield 3 (#255 vs #302 of 946 in-ear headphones) but is discontinued; its replacement, the Moondrop Starfield 2, is rated 4.4/5 at $129.99 and is still sold new.
The case for the Moondrop Starfield: A warm, smooth single dynamic tuning that scores 76 with a 1.85 dB spread, with bass about 1.5 dB above target and accurate mids. The tradeoff: Discontinued and replaced by the Moondrop Starfield 2.
Why pick the Moondrop Starfield 3: Its dual dynamic driver setup reaches a preference score of 75 with a very smooth 1.82 dB deviation from target in two hobbyist measurements, so it avoids harsh peaks. The catch: Presence and treble run about 2 dB below target, and a 3.9 dB dip near 10 kHz takes some shimmer off cymbals.
Buy the Moondrop Starfield 2, the replacement for the discontinued Moondrop Starfield; it is rated higher for sound quality than the Moondrop Starfield 3.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Moondrop Starfield | Moondrop Starfield 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $109.99 Discontinued | $149.99 |
| Ranked | #255 of 946 in In-Ear Headphones | #302 of 946 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic (carbon nanotube diaphragm) | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 7.8mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 7.7 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 122 dB/Vrms | 119 dB/Vrms |
| Frequency Response | 10Hz - 36kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 12Hz - 44kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 76 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ) | 74 (median of 2 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.85 dB standard deviation | 1.82 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.40 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.26 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.7 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Built-in Microphone | - | No |
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Moondrop Starfield:
- Moondrop Starfield vs Moondrop Starfield 2
- Moondrop Starfield 2 vs Moondrop Starfield 3
- Juzear Defiant vs Moondrop Kato
- Fosi Audio IM4 vs Juzear Defiant
- Juzear Defiant vs Moondrop Rays
Prices on this page were last checked October 13, 2026 at 3:17 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Headphones In Full
Moondrop Starfield: $109.99 Discontinued eBay
Newer model: the Moondrop Starfield 2, ranked higher, rated 4.4/5, released Jul 2023. See every Moondrop Starfield generation.
Pros: A warm, smooth single dynamic tuning that scores 76 with a 1.85 dB spread, with bass about 1.5 dB above target and accurate mids. Its 32 ohm, 122 dB/Vrms load is easy to drive.
Cons: Discontinued and replaced by the Moondrop Starfield 2. Treble sits about 4 dB low with a 5.1 dB dip near 6.7 kHz, so it lacks some detail and sparkle.
Full Moondrop Starfield review and specifications →
| Back | Closed |
|---|---|
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.85 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic (carbon nanotube diaphragm) |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 10Hz - 36kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 76 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 122 dB/Vrms |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.7 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.40 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
EQ preset to match the Harman target
Set a preamp of -4.6 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | +0.6 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 7,414 Hz | +5.0 dB | 1.36 |
| Peak | 173 Hz | -2.5 dB | 0.83 |
| Peak | 1,517 Hz | -1.9 dB | 0.92 |
| Peak | 794 Hz | +1.9 dB | 1.08 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -2.4 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 62 Hz | +0.2 dB | 1.70 |
| Peak | 6,128 Hz | +0.9 dB | 5.97 |
| Peak | 4,794 Hz | -0.5 dB | 5.00 |
| Peak | 33 Hz | -0.2 dB | 1.61 |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Moondrop Starfield 3: $149.99 Amazon $149.99 eBay
Pros: Its dual dynamic driver setup reaches a preference score of 75 with a very smooth 1.82 dB deviation from target in two hobbyist measurements, so it avoids harsh peaks. Bass sits within about 1 dB of target and the largest treble peak is only 2.8 dB near 11.9 kHz, giving a warm, easygoing sound with clean cymbals. The 7.7 ohm, 119 dB/Vrms design is extremely easy to drive from a phone. It matches the rating of the AUNE Jasper and AFUL Performer 5 Plus 2, which cost considerably more.
Cons: Presence and treble run about 2 dB below target, and a 3.9 dB dip near 10 kHz takes some shimmer off cymbals. The 7.7 ohm load is low enough that sources with high output impedance can audibly shift its tonal balance.
Full Moondrop Starfield 3 review and specifications →
| Back | Closed |
|---|---|
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.82 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 7.8mm dynamic |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 12Hz - 44kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 74 (median of 2 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 7.7 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 119 dB/Vrms |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.26 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons