Magnepan LRS+ vs KEF R5

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Short answer: the Magnepan LRS+, if you are buying new. The KEF R5 ranks higher than it (#40 vs #149 of 188 floorstanding speakers, 4.4/5 vs 3.5/5) but is discontinued, so only consider it used; the Magnepan LRS+ is still sold new at $1,300.

Magnepan LRS+ vs KEF R5

What the Magnepan LRS+ does well: Thin, two-way planar-magnetic open-baffle/dipole panel design (about 48” tall, just 1” deep). Watch for: Extremely current-hungry and power-hungry: even a pair of 600W Macintosh monoblock amplifiers only averaged about 90dB output.

The KEF R5 is the more accurate choice. Slim three-way tower with the acoustic advantages of KEF’s coincident Uni-Q midrange/tweeter: horizontal and vertical off-axis responses track the direct sound smoothly, producing stable imaging and a well-behaved directivity index. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.78 against 1.27 for the Magnepan LRS+. Watch for: The unusual gap between 77Hz F3 and 33Hz F10 indicates a gradual bass contour rather than flat deep-bass output; a subwoofer and roughly 80Hz high-pass are recommended for high-level playback.

Buy the Magnepan LRS+ new; the KEF R5 is no longer sold new, so it only makes sense as a used find.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Magnepan LRS+ KEF R5
Price$1300 per pair$2,999 per pair Discontinued
Ranked#149 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#40 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)77Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85.1dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)Approximately 86dB/2.83V/1m (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DriversFull-range planar magnetic dipole panel (48” tall x 13.5” wide); quasi-ribbon design, two-way with separate mid/bass and tweeter ribbon sections1” aluminum tweeter coaxial with 5” midrange; dual 5.25” woofers
Weight30 lbs (13.6 kg)59.5 lbs (27 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetopen baffleported, rear
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)Approximately 3.5 ohms minimum near 150Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions48”H x 13.5”W x 1”D (1219.2 x 342.9 x 25.4 mm)40.4”H x 6.9”W x 13.5”D
Spinorama Preference Score1.275.78
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub4.327.40
DIY KitNoNo

More top alternatives to KEF R5:

Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Magnepan LRS+: $1300 per pair Magnepan eBay

Magnepan LRS+ ranking card

Pros: Thin, two-way planar-magnetic open-baffle/dipole panel design (about 48” tall, just 1” deep). Delivers a uniquely dramatic and enveloping soundstage with genuinely three-dimensional depth effects that work across all music genres, not just classical or orchestral material as commonly assumed. Extremely tight, locked-in center-phantom imaging when set up correctly. Open-baffle design avoids the “boxy” enclosure coloration of conventional cabinet speakers. Multitone distortion is remarkably consistent from low to high frequency, a characteristic the reviewer hasn’t observed in conventional cone-and-dome speakers. Compression at high output stays modest (about 0.5-1dB) through the midrange and treble, giving roughly 20-26dB of usable dynamic range in that region. At its price, a strong contender for a dedicated secondary listening room, even if not a main-system replacement. Measured bass extension of 74Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.1dB.

Cons: Extremely current-hungry and power-hungry: even a pair of 600W Macintosh monoblock amplifiers only averaged about 90dB output. A robust, high-power amplifier is essentially mandatory, and budget amps won’t cut it. Bass rolls off very quickly (F3 74Hz, F10 67Hz, described as falling off “like a rock”), making a subwoofer an absolute requirement for any low-end content. A roughly 3dB dip in the mid-bass (100-300Hz) region thins out vocal body and fullness compared to a conventional bookshelf speaker. A resonance/bump around 400Hz adds a mild boxy quality, though it responds well to about 2dB of EQ correction. Extraordinarily fussy about exact positioning: both seating height (must align with the acoustic reference point between the panel’s lower tie-down points) and horizontal aiming are unusually critical; moving just a couple of inches can cause treble content above roughly 500-600Hz to nearly vanish. Distinct off-axis cancellation zones exist directly to the sides of the panel, where very little sound is audible at all. Fails badly under extreme dynamic-transient testing in the bass, and the reviewer blew fuses pushing the speaker during testing: not built for high-volume or highly dynamic playback. A genuinely different category from conventional hi-fi speakers, requiring more setup patience and experimentation than a typical monopole design.

Bass Extension (-10dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions48”H x 13.5”W x 1”D (1219.2 x 342.9 x 25.4 mm)
DriversFull-range planar magnetic dipole panel (48” tall x 13.5” wide); quasi-ribbon design, two-way with separate mid/bass and tweeter ribbon sections
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85.1dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score1.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub4.32
Weight30 lbs (13.6 kg)
Woofer Cabinetopen baffle

KEF R5: $2,999 per pair Discontinued eBay

KEF R5 ranking card

Same family: the KEF R3 (bookshelf, rated 4.5/5), the KEF R7 (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 4.2/5), the KEF R11 (larger floorstanding, ranked lower, estimated 4.3/5) and the KEF R2c (center, rated 4/5).

Pros: Slim three-way tower with the acoustic advantages of KEF’s coincident Uni-Q midrange/tweeter: horizontal and vertical off-axis responses track the direct sound smoothly, producing stable imaging and a well-behaved directivity index. Erin measured deep low-frequency reach for the cabinet width (77Hz F3 but 33Hz F10) and less than 1% harmonic distortion at 86dB. At 96dB it remains clean when high-passed, and its mild response deviations are suitable for equalization because the radiation pattern stays orderly. Measured bass extension of 77Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86dB.

Cons: The unusual gap between 77Hz F3 and 33Hz F10 indicates a gradual bass contour rather than flat deep-bass output; a subwoofer and roughly 80Hz high-pass are recommended for high-level playback. Erin measured a minimum near 3.5 ohms around 150Hz, although most of the curve remains above 4 ohms, so amplifier quality still matters. Sensitivity is approximately 86dB/2.83V/1m. At 102dB, compression reaches roughly 1dB around 150Hz, showing the limits of the twin 5.25-inch woofers. This original model lacks the Meta version’s MAT rear-wave absorption. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)77Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions40.4”H x 6.9”W x 13.5”D
Drivers1” aluminum tweeter coaxial with 5” midrange; dual 5.25” woofers
ImpedanceApproximately 3.5 ohms minimum near 150Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
SensitivityApproximately 86dB/2.83V/1m (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.78
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.40
Weight59.5 lbs (27 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear