Klipsch RP-600M II vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch RP-600M II. It ranks #114 of 203 bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 3.7/5, at $449.99; the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranks #168, rated 3.1/5, and costs $3,500, so there is little reason to consider the other one.

Klipsch RP-600M II vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2

The Klipsch RP-600M II is the more accurate option. Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.64 against 4.25 for the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2. The catch: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot (even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects) and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced.

The Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 is the deeper-bass option. Two-way design with a 1.125” damped Apex Dome silk tweeter and 6.5” cone woofer, using a base of concrete, aluminum, and steel with under-cabinet venting. Its bass reaches about 62Hz before falling 3dB, against 70Hz for the Klipsch RP-600M II. The catch: Sounds notably bright pointed directly on-axis; toeing the speaker out about 30° reduces treble energy and sibilance meaningfully.

Buy the Klipsch RP-600M II. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.

Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-600M II Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2
Price$449.99 per pair$3500 per pair
Ranked#114 of 203 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#168 of 203 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)62Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions15.7”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm)16.3”H x 8.9”W x 14”D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers6.5” Cerametallic cone woofer, 1” titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn1x 6.5” mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1” (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetportedported, front
Spinorama Preference Score5.644.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.776.54
DIY KitNoNo

How Klipsch RP-600M II compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch RP-600M II: $449.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-600M II ranking card

Older model: the Klipsch RP-600M (ranked lower, rated 2.9/5).

Same family: the Klipsch RP-500M II (smaller bookshelf, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (smallest floorstanding, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-6000F II (floorstanding, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-8000F II (largest floorstanding, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-404C II (smallest center, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-500C II (center, rated 3.9/5) and the Klipsch RP-504C II (largest center, rated 3.8/5).

Pros: Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. Roughly 10-20° wider horizontal radiation than the original, giving more soundstage envelopment while retaining precise imaging. A major step up in overall tonal neutrality compared to the original RP-600M, largely eliminating that model’s midrange resonance issues. Unusually, sounds better with the grille on: the grille smooths out the elevated treble rather than degrading the sound, a rare trait among speakers the reviewer has tested. More refined back-panel hardware, including anodized binding posts and jumper cables for optional bi-amping. Responds well to EQ correction (verified using measurement software and a miniDSP), letting the on-axis response be made genuinely linear. Measured bass extension of 70Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86dB.

Cons: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot (even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects) and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced. Horizontal dispersion is very slightly less linear across angles than the original RP-600M, a minor trade-off for the wider overall radiation pattern. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity (about 94.5dB) is, like the original, a half-space rating roughly 9dB above the anechoic reality (closer to 85-86dB). In-room bass rolls off around 60Hz in practice, and a 120Hz boost paired with a midrange scoop gives kick drums their “tambour” without real low-end weight: a subwoofer is still recommended. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Toeing the speaker out for better on-axis tonality (rather than using the grille) introduces slightly more diffuse imaging from added sidewall reflections.

Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions15.7”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm)
Drivers6.5” Cerametallic cone woofer, 1” titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.64
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.77
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2: $3500 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranking card

Older model: the Sonus Faber Sonetto II (ranked lower, rated 3/5).

Same family: the Sonus Faber Sonetto I G2 (smaller bookshelf, estimated 3/5), the Sonus Faber Sonetto III G2 (smaller floorstanding, estimated 3.2/5), the Sonus Faber Sonetto V G2 (larger floorstanding, estimated 3.3/5) and the Sonus Faber Sonetto Center G2 (center, estimated 3/5).

Pros: Two-way design with a 1.125” damped Apex Dome silk tweeter and 6.5” cone woofer, using a base of concrete, aluminum, and steel with under-cabinet venting. Notably more neutral than Sonus Faber’s own Lumina 2, which runs 2-5dB hotter in the treble. Horizontal directivity narrows at a fairly constant, well-behaved rate rather than narrowing-then-widening-then-narrowing like some rivals (including the Lumina 2), meaning sidewall reflections match the direct sound well enough that the reviewer doesn’t recommend sidewall absorption for this speaker. The tweeter-to-woofer crossover handoff around 3kHz looks clean, suggesting a higher-order crossover than typical for the size/price class. Good dynamic range: the low end loses only about 2dB from 76dB to 96dB, otherwise holding up well. Not a difficult amplifier load (about 4.2 ohms minimum impedance). Bass extension reaches a genuine 50Hz in-room, fuller than the Lumina 2. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.

Cons: Sounds notably bright pointed directly on-axis; toeing the speaker out about 30° reduces treble energy and sibilance meaningfully. A resonance around 700Hz gives vocals a slightly nasal, hollow quality. A dip in the upper midrange (roughly 1-2kHz) reduces perceived detail and attack, while the elevated treble can read as “analytical” or “detailed” to some listeners despite being a coloration rather than true resolution. Needs more clearance from the rear wall than some rivals (about 1.5-2 feet in an ideal room, more or less depending on your specific room modes) or the 80-120Hz region can become boomy. Vertical listening window is limited to about ±10-15° from the tweeter axis. Some unexplained directivity irregularities appear around 1.2kHz and 1.6kHz, possibly port-related, along with a longer decay in the 800Hz-1600Hz range in burst-decay measurements. Multitone distortion approaches the reviewer’s 3% threshold through the midrange, though likely not obviously audible without direct A/B comparison. A resonance in the cabinet appears around 400Hz in impedance measurements.

Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)62Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions16.3”H x 8.9”W x 14”D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Drivers1x 6.5” mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1” (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score4.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.54
Weight38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, front