Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Control 1 Pro

Last updated: October 6, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch RP-500M II. It ranks #27 of 160 bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 4.0/5, at $389.99. The JBL Control 1 Pro ranks #145, rated 2.0/5, at $240, $149.99 cheaper, which does not close the gap in sound quality.

Klipsch RP-500M II vs JBL Control 1 Pro

The Klipsch RP-500M II is the more accurate, deeper-bass pick. Major mid-range clarity improvement over the original RP-500M: about a 5dB fill-in between 1-3kHz in the estimated in-room response, giving a noticeably more resolved, detailed midrange. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.22 against 2.87 for the JBL Control 1 Pro. Its bass reaches about 67Hz before falling 3dB, against 78Hz for the JBL Control 1 Pro. The catch: Klipsch’s quoted sensitivity (around 92-93dB) uses an unconventional in-room-based rating rather than the standard anechoic measurement; on an anechoic basis it measures closer to about 85dB, in line with typical bookshelf speakers this size, so it isn’t the outlier in efficiency the spec sheet implies.

Why pick the JBL Control 1 Pro: Magnetically shielded transducers and a rugged molded enclosure make it a durable choice for wall-mount or install use, with SonicGuard overload protection built into the crossover. The catch: Sound power and predicted in-room response measurements are badly uneven compared to the JBL 305P Mark II tested alongside it, with no waveguide to control directivity as the woofer beams before handing off to the tweeter.

Buy the Klipsch RP-500M II. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $149.99 you would save on the JBL Control 1 Pro does not close the gap.

Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-500M II JBL Control 1 Pro
Price$389.99 per pair$240 per pair
Ranked#27 of 160 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers#145 of 160 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)55Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)78Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Crossover Frequency1530Hz-
Dimensions13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm)9.3H x 6.3W x 5.6D in
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms
Sensitivity85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)87dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn5.25” low frequency driver, 0.75” polycarbonate dome tweeter
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each4 lbs (1.8 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rearsealed
Spinorama Preference Score5.222.87
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.846.37
DIY KitNoNo
Frequency Response-80Hz - 20kHz -10dB (Manufacturer specified)
Power Handling-150W

More top alternatives to Klipsch RP-500M II:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch RP-500M II: $389.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-500M II ranking card

Older model: the Klipsch RP-500M (ranked lower, rated 3.4/5).

Same family: the Klipsch RP-600M II (larger bookshelf, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (smallest floorstanding, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-6000F II (floorstanding, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-8000F II (largest floorstanding, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-404C II (smallest center, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-500C II (center, rated 3.9/5) and the Klipsch RP-504C II (largest center, rated 3.8/5).

Pros: Major mid-range clarity improvement over the original RP-500M: about a 5dB fill-in between 1-3kHz in the estimated in-room response, giving a noticeably more resolved, detailed midrange. More neutral and linear overall than its sibling RP-600M II, which carries about 2-3dB more high-frequency energy and a touch more bass but less overall balance. Very precise soundstage imaging and instrument placement. Distortion through the midrange is cleaner than the previous generation. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.

Cons: Klipsch’s quoted sensitivity (around 92-93dB) uses an unconventional in-room-based rating rather than the standard anechoic measurement; on an anechoic basis it measures closer to about 85dB, in line with typical bookshelf speakers this size, so it isn’t the outlier in efficiency the spec sheet implies. Horizontal dispersion of about ±40-50° is narrower and more directive than the reviewer’s preference for a wider, more enveloping soundstage. Toeing the speaker out to widen the soundstage or soften on-axis brightness comes at some cost to imaging precision. Slightly less clean in the tweeter region than the midrange, likely tied to crossover placement, though not considered a dealbreaker. Low-frequency output is limited: measured around 95dB at 4 meters for the pair before the woofers started to unload, so a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting real bass rather than stepping up to a larger model.

Bass Extension (-10dB)53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Crossover Frequency1530Hz
DIY KitNo
Dimensions13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm)
Drivers5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.22
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.84
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

JBL Control 1 Pro: $240 per pair Parts Express eBay

JBL Control 1 Pro ranking card

Pros: Magnetically shielded transducers and a rugged molded enclosure make it a durable choice for wall-mount or install use, with SonicGuard overload protection built into the crossover. Feels solidly built despite the low price, and the professional crossover network uses steep slopes. Measured bass extension of 78Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.

Cons: Sound power and predicted in-room response measurements are badly uneven compared to the JBL 305P Mark II tested alongside it, with no waveguide to control directivity as the woofer beams before handing off to the tweeter. The reviewer performed no distortion or dedicated listening test on this unit and concluded he didn’t “think there is a reason to purchase it” over a proper studio monitor at a similar price.

Bass Extension (-10dB)55Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)78Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions9.3H x 6.3W x 5.6D in
Drivers5.25” low frequency driver, 0.75” polycarbonate dome tweeter
Frequency Response80Hz - 20kHz -10dB (Manufacturer specified)
Impedance4 ohms
Power Handling150W
Sensitivity87dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score2.87
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.37
Weight4 lbs (1.8 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetsealed