Klipsch RP-500M II vs Dynaudio X14

Last updated: October 9, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch RP-500M II. It ranks #27 of 160 bookshelf speakers by sound quality (rated 4.0/5) at $389.99 and is still sold new; the Dynaudio X14 ranks #110 (rated 2.9/5) and is discontinued, so it is only an option used.

Klipsch RP-500M II vs Dynaudio X14

The Klipsch RP-500M II is the more accurate pick. Major mid-range clarity improvement over the original Klipsch RP-500M: about a 5dB fill-in between 1-3kHz in the estimated in-room response, giving a noticeably more resolved, detailed midrange. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.22 against 4.57 for the Dynaudio X14. The tradeoff: Klipsch’s quoted sensitivity (around 92-93dB) uses an unconventional in-room-based rating rather than the standard anechoic measurement; on an anechoic basis it measures closer to about 85dB, in line with typical bookshelf speakers this size, so it isn’t the outlier in efficiency the spec sheet implies.

The case for the Dynaudio X14: 1” silk-dome tweeter and 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer in a compact two-way stand-mount, rated at 85dB sensitivity. The catch: CEA2034 spinorama shows an uneven on-axis response from the lack of a waveguide to control tweeter beam width, plus a port resonance that boosts the lower midrange and imperfect crossover matching between the drivers.

Buy the Klipsch RP-500M II. It is rated higher for sound quality and still sold new, while the Dynaudio X14 is discontinued.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-500M II Dynaudio X14
Price$389.99 per pair$1,500 per pair Discontinued
Ranked#27 of 160 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers#110 of 160 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)43.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)67.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Crossover Frequency1530Hz-
Dimensions13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm)11.2”H x 6.7”W x 10”D (285 x 170 x 255 mm)
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)8 ohms nominal
Sensitivity85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)82dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn1” silk dome tweeter, 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each14.3 lbs (6.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported
Spinorama Preference Score5.224.57 (spinorama.org)
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.846.94 (spinorama.org)
DIY KitNoNo
Frequency Response-50Hz - 23kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)

How Klipsch RP-500M II compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch RP-500M II: $389.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-500M II ranking card

Older model: the Klipsch RP-500M (ranked lower, rated 3.4/5).

Same family: the Klipsch RP-600M II (larger bookshelf, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (smallest floorstanding, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-6000F II (floorstanding, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-8000F II (largest floorstanding, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-404C II (smallest center, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-500C II (center, rated 3.9/5) and the Klipsch RP-504C II (largest center, rated 3.8/5).

Pros: Major mid-range clarity improvement over the original Klipsch RP-500M: about a 5dB fill-in between 1-3kHz in the estimated in-room response, giving a noticeably more resolved, detailed midrange. More neutral and linear overall than its sibling Klipsch RP-600M II, which carries about 2-3dB more high-frequency energy and a touch more bass but less overall balance. Very precise soundstage imaging and instrument placement. Distortion through the midrange is cleaner than the previous generation. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85dB.

Cons: Klipsch’s quoted sensitivity (around 92-93dB) uses an unconventional in-room-based rating rather than the standard anechoic measurement; on an anechoic basis it measures closer to about 85dB, in line with typical bookshelf speakers this size, so it isn’t the outlier in efficiency the spec sheet implies. Horizontal dispersion of about ±40-50° is narrower and more directive than the reviewer’s preference for a wider, more enveloping soundstage. Toeing the speaker out to widen the soundstage or soften on-axis brightness comes at some cost to imaging precision. Slightly less clean in the tweeter region than the midrange, likely tied to crossover placement, though not considered a dealbreaker. Low-frequency output is limited: measured around 95dB at 4 meters for the pair before the woofers started to unload, so a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting real bass rather than stepping up to a larger model.

Bass Extension (-10dB)53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Crossover Frequency1530Hz
DIY KitNo
Dimensions13.6”H x 6.8”W x 10.6”D (344.4 x 173 x 270.5 mm)
Drivers5.25” Cerametallic™ cone woofer with Faraday rings, 1” LTS Titanium diaphragm tweeter with Hybrid Cross-Section Expanded Tractrix® horn
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score5.22
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.84
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Dynaudio X14: $1,500 per pair Discontinued eBay

Dynaudio X14 ranking card

Pros: 1” silk-dome tweeter and 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer in a compact two-way stand-mount, rated at 85dB sensitivity. Measured bass extension of 67.4Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 82dB.

Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows an uneven on-axis response from the lack of a waveguide to control tweeter beam width, plus a port resonance that boosts the lower midrange and imperfect crossover matching between the drivers. Too much energy in the lower and upper treble reads as bright, and directivity narrows at higher frequencies rather than staying controlled. The reviewer’s verdict: out of the box, the objective performance isn’t that great, though EQ can make it a satisfying speaker. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)43.9Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)67.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions11.2”H x 6.7”W x 10”D (285 x 170 x 255 mm)
Drivers1” silk dome tweeter, 5.7” magnesium-silicate-polymer woofer
Frequency Response50Hz - 23kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
Impedance8 ohms nominal
Sensitivity82dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score4.57 (spinorama.org)
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.94 (spinorama.org)
Weight14.3 lbs (6.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported