Kinera Imperial Loki vs Noble Audio Sultan

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Noble Audio Sultan. Both are rated 3.6/5 for sound quality (#695 and #774 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Noble Audio Sultan costs $2,900 against $3,099 for the Kinera Imperial Loki, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.

Kinera Imperial Loki vs Noble Audio Sultan

The case for the Kinera Imperial Loki: A twelve driver flagship with a dynamic driver, six balanced armatures, four electrostatic tweeters and a bone conduction driver. Watch for: Treble sits about 2.7 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance.

The case for the Noble Audio Sultan: Bass extends on target to 20 Hz with about 2.6 dB of extra midbass in HypetheSonics’ measurement, giving a warm, full low end, and its 2.4 dB average deviation is fairly smooth. The tradeoff: A 7.4 dB dip near 3.2 kHz and a 3.4 dB shortfall across 3 to 6 kHz recess vocals and the attack of guitars and pianos.

Buy the Noble Audio Sultan. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $199 less than the Kinera Imperial Loki.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

Kinera Imperial Loki

A twelve driver flagship with a dynamic driver, six balanced armatures, four electrostatic tweeters and a bone conduction driver.

Kinera official store $3,099.00 eBay
$3,099
Noble Audio Sultan

Bass extends on target to 20 Hz with about 2.6 dB of extra midbass in HypetheSonics’ measurement, giving a warm, full low end, and its 2.4 dB average deviation is fairly smooth.

Audio46 $2,900.00 eBay
$2,900

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Kinera Imperial Loki Noble Audio Sultan
Price$3,099.00$2,900.00
Ranked#774 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#695 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeQuadbridHybrid (1 dynamic + 4 balanced armature + 2 electrostatic)
Drivers1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 4 x electrostatic + 1 x bone conduction1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature + 2 x electrostatic
Impedance12 ohms-
Sensitivity107 dB @ 1kHz-
Harman Preference Score68 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)69 (measured by HypetheSonics, via AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.09 dB standard deviation2.41 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.64 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.60 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.4 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.4 dB at 30 Hz)
Built-in Microphone-No

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Kinera Imperial LokiNoble Audio SultanHarman target
Frequency response of the Kinera Imperial Loki and Noble Audio Sultan-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Kinera Imperial Loki from mmagtech, silicagel, soundignity and tonedeafmonk; the Noble Audio Sultan from bloomaudio, elrics and hbb, all via squig.link.

How Noble Audio Sultan compares with other leading options: