Kinera Celest Yaksha vs TOZO Golden X1

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Kinera Celest Yaksha. Both are rated 3.6/5 for sound quality (#727 and #775 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Kinera Celest Yaksha costs $139 against $149.99 for the TOZO Golden X1, with sound quality a draw, the lower price decides it.

Kinera Celest Yaksha vs TOZO Golden X1

The case for the Kinera Celest Yaksha: A four driver hybrid with two dynamic drivers, a Knowles balanced armature and a micro planar. The tradeoff: Treble sits about 3.0 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance.

What the TOZO Golden X1 does well: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 68 against the Harman target. The catch: An uneven response, 2.1 dB standard deviation from target.

Buy the Kinera Celest Yaksha. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $10.99 less than the TOZO Golden X1.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

Kinera Celest Yaksha

A four driver hybrid with two dynamic drivers, a Knowles balanced armature and a micro planar.

Amazon $139.00 eBay
$139
TOZO Golden X1

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 68 against the Harman target.

Amazon $149.99 eBay
$149.99

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Kinera Celest Yaksha TOZO Golden X1
Price$139.00$149.99
Ranked#727 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#775 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredBluetooth
Driver TypeHybridHybrid
Drivers2 x dynamic + 1 x balanced armature + 1 x micro planar1 Dynamic (12mm), 1 Balanced Armature
Harman Preference Score69 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)68 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.18 dB standard deviation2.11 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.71 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-1.01 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.0 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+3.0 dB at 30 Hz)
Bluetooth-Yes

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Kinera Celest YakshaTOZO Golden X1Harman target
Frequency response of the Kinera Celest Yaksha and TOZO Golden X1-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Kinera Celest Yaksha from arn, atechreviews, audioamigo, dl, gadgetgenerations, hbb, jaytiss, pw, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk; the TOZO Golden X1 from boizoff, fernandagunsan and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.

How Kinera Celest Yaksha compares with other leading options: