KEF Q11 Meta vs KLH Model Five

Last updated: August 15, 2026

Short answer: the KEF Q11 Meta. It ranks #34 of 54 floorstanding speakers by sound quality at $1249.99; the KLH Model Five ranks #35 and costs $1999.98, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

What the KEF Q11 Meta offers: Three-way tower design with a coaxial layout: a 3/4” aluminum dome tweeter (with KEF’s Metamaterial Absorption Technology behind it) mounted at the center of a 4” mid-range, plus three 6.5” bass drivers. Watch for: Genuinely dark-sounding on raw on-axis measurement, and needs a typical room with sidewall reflections (within about 6 feet/2 meters) to sound properly neutral - in a large room with little sidewall interaction, it may sound too…

What the KLH Model Five offers: Exceptionally wide and even horizontal radiation of roughly +/-70-80 degrees gives a spacious soundstage without sacrificing image focus when toed out about 10 degrees. Watch for: On-axis response is visibly irregular because the wide vintage baffle creates diffraction, and the upper/lower midbass mismatch around 200Hz can sound lean away from the intended wall placement.

Buy the KEF Q11 Meta. It ranks higher for sound quality than the KLH Model Five and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.

KEF Q11 Meta vs KLH Model Five

Specifications Side By Side

KEF Q11 Meta KLH Model Five
Price$1,249.99$1999.98
Ranked#34 of 54 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#35 of 54 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)29Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)-
Bass Extension (-3dB)60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)52Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers25mm tweeter + dual 165mm drivers10" paper-cone woofer, 4" paper-cone midrange, 1" aluminum-dome tweeter
Weight106.9 lbs / 48.5 kg44.1 lbs / 20 kg each without stand; 52 lbs / 23.6 kg with stand
Sensitivity88.6dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)About 85dB @ 2.83V/1m (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner; 87.5dB free-field manufacturer specified)
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.2 ohms minimum, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)6 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum at 140Hz (manufacturer specified)
Dimensions43.8"H x 12.5"W x 15"D (1112.8 x 317.5 x 381.0 mm)26"H x 13.8"W x 11.5"D (660 x 350 x 292 mm) without stand
Woofer Cabinetported, rearsealed acoustic suspension

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

KEF Q11 Meta: $1,249.99 Amazon

KEF Q11 Meta ranking card

Pros: Three-way tower design with a coaxial layout: a 3/4” aluminum dome tweeter (with KEF’s Metamaterial Absorption Technology behind it) mounted at the center of a 4” mid-range, plus three 6.5” bass drivers. Extremely linear estimated in-room response when placed correctly, thanks to a deliberately declining on-axis response paired with well-controlled directivity - a technically sound design philosophy, even though it reads as “dark” in raw anechoic on-axis measurements. In-room bass extension to about 40-50Hz when placed near a wall, thanks to extended bass-shelf tuning. Sounds excellent whether pointed directly at the listener or toed out a full 30° parallel to the back wall - unusually flexible placement. More vertical listening leeway than standard non-coaxial two-way designs, thanks to the coincident tweeter/midrange. Distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, and multitone distortion holds up well too. Comes with a plinth/outrigger kit for stability given its floorstanding height (about 43-44”).

Cons: Genuinely dark-sounding on raw on-axis measurement, and needs a typical room with sidewall reflections (within about 6 feet/2 meters) to sound properly neutral - in a large room with little sidewall interaction, it may sound too dull for some listeners. Must be placed close to a rear wall (about 1 foot) to get proper bass - pulling it out to the “standard” 3-foot audiophile recommendation causes bass output to drop off noticeably. Horizontal radiation of about ±50° is narrower than the reviewer’s preferred ±60°, giving a slightly less enveloping soundstage than some rivals. Notably darker than sibling KEF models in the same product family - measures 2-5dB less top-end energy than the R3 Meta and a few dB less than the Q Concerto Meta. Minor lingering resonances appear in burst decay measurements between 500Hz-1kHz. The tweeter shows some strain at very high output volumes, a limitation the reviewer notes is common even among more budget-friendly speakers generally.

Bass Extension (-10dB)29Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)60Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions43.8"H x 12.5"W x 15"D (1112.8 x 317.5 x 381.0 mm)
Drivers25mm tweeter + dual 165mm drivers
Impedance4 ohms nominal (3.2 ohms minimum, measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity88.6dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight106.9 lbs / 48.5 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

KLH Model Five: $1999.98 Crutchfield

KLH Model Five ranking card

Pros: Exceptionally wide and even horizontal radiation of roughly +/-70-80 degrees gives a spacious soundstage without sacrificing image focus when toed out about 10 degrees. Three rear-panel mid/high attenuation settings are genuinely useful for room and placement matching; Erin preferred Low in his room, with the grille fitted and slight toe-out. The sealed 10-inch acoustic-suspension woofer reaches an Erin-measured F3 near 52Hz and integrates gradually with a subwoofer. At 96dB/1m, harmonic distortion stays mostly below 1%, and multitone distortion is also well controlled. Compression is good at ordinary and high listening levels until the most extreme sweep, supporting convincing dynamics. The included slanted stands aim the unusually low tweeter toward seated ear height. Near-wall placement naturally fills the mild 200Hz baffle-step depression, as the manual intends.

Cons: On-axis response is visibly irregular because the wide vintage baffle creates diffraction, and the upper/lower midbass mismatch around 200Hz can sound lean away from the intended wall placement. Erin heard a mild 800-900Hz resonance that coincides with a clear impedance blip, plus occasional hardness around the 2-4kHz crossover region at elevated level. Vertical directivity is narrow; the included five-degree slant bases are important because the tweeter otherwise aims below seated ears. The top end rolls off relative to the midrange, producing a warm balance that may not suit listeners seeking maximum air. At the highest test level the tweeter develops substantial compression. Large size, 52lb weight with stand and roughly $2,000/pair price are significant commitments, and subwoofers remain necessary for the lowest octave.

Bass Extension (-3dB)52Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions26"H x 13.8"W x 11.5"D (660 x 350 x 292 mm) without stand
Drivers10" paper-cone woofer, 4" paper-cone midrange, 1" aluminum-dome tweeter
Impedance6 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum at 140Hz (manufacturer specified)
SensitivityAbout 85dB @ 2.83V/1m (measured, Erin's Audio Corner; 87.5dB free-field manufacturer specified)
Weight44.1 lbs / 20 kg each without stand; 52 lbs / 23.6 kg with stand
Woofer Cabinetsealed acoustic suspension

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.