Short answer: the Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 if sound quality matters most, the KEF Q11 Meta if price matters most. The Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 ranks #5 of 71 floorstanding speakers at $7998. The KEF Q11 Meta ranks #46 at $1249.99, $6748.01 cheaper.
What the Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 offers: ASR’s revised Spinorama measurement shows bass reaching 32.2Hz at -3dB and 27.8Hz at -6dB, giving substantial low-end weight without a subwoofer. The response spans 2.3dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with preference scores of 5.10 standalone and 6.12 with an ideal subwoofer. The review’s exceptionally low bass distortion at ordinary levels complements that extension, while dual 6.5-inch Purifi woofers provide a strong foundation for full-range listening. Watch for: Vertical directivity is narrow and horizontal coverage is uneven, so listening height and placement affect tonal balance. Treble resonances and response irregularities keep it from reference-level neutrality. Spinorama’s modeled EQ improves the scores to 6.09 standalone and 6.99 with an ideal subwoofer, but those are corrected results, not stock performance. Measured sensitivity is 85.9dB at 2.83V/1m with a nominal 4-ohm load; use an amplifier comfortable driving 4 ohms. Distortion rises at very high playback levels.
What the KEF Q11 Meta offers: Three-way tower design with a coaxial layout: a 3/4” aluminum dome tweeter (with KEF’s Metamaterial Absorption Technology behind it) mounted at the center of a 4” mid-range, plus three 6.5” bass drivers. Extremely linear estimated in-room response when placed correctly, thanks to a deliberately declining on-axis response paired with well-controlled directivity - a technically sound design philosophy, even though it reads as “dark” in raw anechoic on-axis measurements. In-room bass extension to about 40-50Hz when placed near a wall, thanks to extended bass-shelf tuning. Sounds excellent whether pointed directly at the listener or toed out a full 30° parallel to the back wall - unusually flexible placement. More vertical listening leeway than standard non-coaxial two-way designs, thanks to the coincident tweeter/midrange. Distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, and multitone distortion holds up well too. Comes with a plinth/outrigger kit for stability given its floorstanding height (about 43-44”). Watch for: Genuinely dark-sounding on raw on-axis measurement, and needs a typical room with sidewall reflections (within about 6 feet/2 meters) to sound properly neutral - in a large room with little sidewall interaction, it may sound too dull for some listeners. Must be placed close to a rear wall (about 1 foot) to get proper bass - pulling it out to the “standard” 3-foot audiophile recommendation causes bass output to drop off noticeably. Horizontal radiation of about ±50° is narrower than the reviewer’s preferred ±60°, giving a slightly less enveloping soundstage than some rivals. Notably darker than sibling KEF models in the same product family - measures 2-5dB less top-end energy than the R3 Meta and a few dB less than the Q Concerto Meta. Minor lingering resonances appear in burst decay measurements between 500Hz-1kHz. The tweeter shows some strain at very high output volumes, a limitation the reviewer notes is common even among more budget-friendly speakers generally.
Buy the Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the KEF Q11 Meta if the price matters more than sound quality.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 | KEF Q11 Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7,998 per pair | $1,249.99 per pair |
| Ranked | #5 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #46 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 32.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 60Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 24.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 29Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85.9dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review; 86dB manufacturer specified) | 88.6dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | Custom waveguide-loaded tweeter with beam-expansion fins, 2x 6.5" Purifi USHINDI aluminum-cone woofers | 25mm tweeter + dual 165mm drivers |
| Dimensions | 40.4"H x 8.7"W x 14"D (1025 x 222 x 355 mm) | 43.8"H x 12.5"W x 15"D (1112.8 x 317.5 x 381.0 mm) |
| Weight | 101.4 lbs (46 kg) each | 106.9 lbs (48.5 kg) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal | 4 ohms nominal (3.2 ohms minimum, measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 2.4kHz | - |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, large rear port | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.10 | 6.08 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.12 | 7.39 |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66:
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F328Be
Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66: $7,998 per pair Radiant Acoustics eBay
Pros: ASR’s revised Spinorama measurement shows bass reaching 32.2Hz at -3dB and 27.8Hz at -6dB, giving substantial low-end weight without a subwoofer. The response spans 2.3dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with preference scores of 5.10 standalone and 6.12 with an ideal subwoofer. The review’s exceptionally low bass distortion at ordinary levels complements that extension, while dual 6.5-inch Purifi woofers provide a strong foundation for full-range listening. Measured bass extension of 32.2Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.9dB.
Cons: Vertical directivity is narrow and horizontal coverage is uneven, so listening height and placement affect tonal balance. Treble resonances and response irregularities keep it from reference-level neutrality. Spinorama’s modeled EQ improves the scores to 6.09 standalone and 6.99 with an ideal subwoofer, but those are corrected results, not stock performance. Measured sensitivity is 85.9dB at 2.83V/1m with a nominal 4-ohm load; use an amplifier comfortable driving 4 ohms. Distortion rises at very high playback levels.
Full Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 24.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 32.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Crossover Frequency | 2.4kHz |
| Dimensions | 40.4"H x 8.7"W x 14"D (1025 x 222 x 355 mm) |
| Drivers | Custom waveguide-loaded tweeter with beam-expansion fins, 2x 6.5" Purifi USHINDI aluminum-cone woofers |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 85.9dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review; 86dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.10 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.12 |
| Weight | 101.4 lbs (46 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, large rear port |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F328Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F226Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs JBL 4367
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F228Be
- See all 23 comparisons
KEF Q11 Meta: $1,249.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: Three-way tower design with a coaxial layout: a 3/4” aluminum dome tweeter (with KEF’s Metamaterial Absorption Technology behind it) mounted at the center of a 4” mid-range, plus three 6.5” bass drivers. Extremely linear estimated in-room response when placed correctly, thanks to a deliberately declining on-axis response paired with well-controlled directivity - a technically sound design philosophy, even though it reads as “dark” in raw anechoic on-axis measurements. In-room bass extension to about 40-50Hz when placed near a wall, thanks to extended bass-shelf tuning. Sounds excellent whether pointed directly at the listener or toed out a full 30° parallel to the back wall - unusually flexible placement. More vertical listening leeway than standard non-coaxial two-way designs, thanks to the coincident tweeter/midrange. Distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, and multitone distortion holds up well too. Comes with a plinth/outrigger kit for stability given its floorstanding height (about 43-44”). Measured bass extension of 60Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.6dB.
Cons: Genuinely dark-sounding on raw on-axis measurement, and needs a typical room with sidewall reflections (within about 6 feet/2 meters) to sound properly neutral - in a large room with little sidewall interaction, it may sound too dull for some listeners. Must be placed close to a rear wall (about 1 foot) to get proper bass - pulling it out to the “standard” 3-foot audiophile recommendation causes bass output to drop off noticeably. Horizontal radiation of about ±50° is narrower than the reviewer’s preferred ±60°, giving a slightly less enveloping soundstage than some rivals. Notably darker than sibling KEF models in the same product family - measures 2-5dB less top-end energy than the R3 Meta and a few dB less than the Q Concerto Meta. Minor lingering resonances appear in burst decay measurements between 500Hz-1kHz. The tweeter shows some strain at very high output volumes, a limitation the reviewer notes is common even among more budget-friendly speakers generally.
Full KEF Q11 Meta review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 29Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 60Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 43.8"H x 12.5"W x 15"D (1112.8 x 317.5 x 381.0 mm) |
| Drivers | 25mm tweeter + dual 165mm drivers |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (3.2 ohms minimum, measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 88.6dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.08 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.39 |
| Weight | 106.9 lbs (48.5 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- KEF Q11 Meta vs KLH Model Five
- KEF Q11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-5000F II
- KEF Q11 Meta vs Klipsch Heresy IV
- KEF Q11 Meta vs SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle
- KEF Q11 Meta vs Polk Audio XT60
- KEF Q11 Meta vs Monolith THX-365T
- KEF Q11 Meta vs Klipsch Forte IV
- KEF Q11 Meta vs Klipsch RP-8000F II
- See all 45 comparisons