Short answer: the Kanto Tuk G2 on measured sound quality, the Edifier MR4 on price. The Kanto Tuk G2 ranks #33 of 68 powered bookshelf speakers, rated 3.9/5, at $899.99. The Edifier MR4 ranks #49, rated 3.5/5, at $138.99, $761 cheaper.
Why pick the Kanto Tuk G2: Bass reaches about 52Hz at -3dB and 42Hz at -10dB in Erin’s measurements, legitimate extension from a 5.25-inch woofer. The tradeoff: On-axis response is uneven, with elevated upper bass around 80 to 100Hz, a forward midrange near 800Hz to 1.5kHz and further ripples through the treble.
The case for the Edifier MR4: Erin’s data supports a useful budget desktop monitor: a 3.0dB midrange span, little overall on-axis tilt, and preference scores of 3.25 standalone and 6.00 with an ideal subwoofer. Watch for: Bass reaches -3dB around 79Hz, so deep extension should not be inferred from the overall flat trend.
Buy the Kanto Tuk G2 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Edifier MR4 if the price matters more than sound quality.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Powered Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Kanto Tuk G2 | Edifier MR4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $899.99 per pair | $138.99 per pair |
| Ranked | #33 of 68 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #49 of 68 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Dimensions | 7.2”W x 12”H x 10”D (183 x 305 x 254 mm) | 9”H x 5.5”W x 7.6”D (228.6 x 139.7 x 193 mm) |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz-22kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | Optical, 2x RCA, USB-C, Bluetooth | TRS Balanced, RCA, Aux |
| Outputs | Subwoofer RCA (80Hz low-pass), USB-A charging (5V/2A) | Headphone |
| Weight | 12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) (active), 11.5 lbs (5.2 kg) (passive) | 9.9 lbs (4.5 kg) |
| Drivers | 5.25-inch aluminum woofer + AMT folded ribbon tweeter (each), bass reflex | 4” (102mm) woofer, 1” silk dome tweeter |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | - |
| Bluetooth Codecs | aptX Adaptive, SBC | - |
| DSP | Yes | - |
| Amplifier Power | 130W Class D total (Manufacturer specified) | 42W RMS total (21W per speaker) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 52Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 79Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 42Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 59Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.61 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data) | 3.25 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.73 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data) | 6.00 |
| Measurement Source | Erin’s Audio Corner | - |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes | - |
| Headphone Output | No | Yes |
| XLR Input | No | No |
| RCA Input | Yes | Yes |
| TRS Input | No | Yes |
| Optical Input | Yes | No |
| Coaxial Input | No | No |
| USB Input | Yes | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | No |
| Aux Input | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.4 | No |
| App | - | No |
| EQ | - | Yes (Monitor and Music modes) |
| Sensitivity | - | 78dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Kanto Tuk G2 compares with other leading options:
- Kanto Tuk G2 vs Airpulse A100
- Kanto Tuk G2 vs KEF LSX II LT
- Kanto Tuk G2 vs Kanto YU6
- Kanto Tuk G2 vs Kali LP-UNF
- Kanto Tuk G2 vs Vanatoo Transparent Zero Plus
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Kanto Tuk G2: $899.99 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Bass reaches about 52Hz at -3dB and 42Hz at -10dB in Erin’s measurements, legitimate extension from a 5.25-inch woofer. The predicted in-room response is fairly even from the upper bass through the treble, which lifts its preference score to about 4.6 on its own and 6.7 with an ideal subwoofer. Connections cover most desk and living room sources: optical, two RCA inputs, USB-C from a computer and Bluetooth 5.4 with aptX Adaptive, plus a subwoofer output with an 80Hz low-pass, a remote and a USB charging port. Measured bass extension of 52Hz (-3dB).
Cons: On-axis response is uneven, with elevated upper bass around 80 to 100Hz, a forward midrange near 800Hz to 1.5kHz and further ripples through the treble. Horizontal dispersion widens abruptly around 2 to 2.5kHz before narrowing again, and the vertical listening window is narrow, so keep the AMT tweeter near ear height. Compression grows at 96dB and becomes severe near 102dB, with distortion rising sharply at high levels, so it sounds best as a nearfield or small room speaker at moderate volume.
Full Kanto Tuk G2 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 130W Class D total (Manufacturer specified) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 42Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 52Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.4 |
| Bluetooth Codecs | aptX Adaptive, SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | Yes |
| Dimensions | 7.2”W x 12”H x 10”D (183 x 305 x 254 mm) |
| Drivers | 5.25-inch aluminum woofer + AMT folded ribbon tweeter (each), bass reflex |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz-22kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Headphone Output | No |
| Inputs | Optical, 2x RCA, USB-C, Bluetooth |
| Measurement Source | Erin’s Audio Corner |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| Outputs | Subwoofer RCA (80Hz low-pass), USB-A charging (5V/2A) |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.61 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.73 (calculated from Erin’s Audio Corner CEA2034 data) |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 12.3 lbs (5.6 kg) (active), 11.5 lbs (5.2 kg) (passive) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Edifier MR4: $138.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: Erin’s data supports a useful budget desktop monitor: a 3.0dB midrange span, little overall on-axis tilt, and preference scores of 3.25 standalone and 6.00 with an ideal subwoofer. Balanced TRS inputs and tone controls are practical at its price, and its response is more balanced than the measured R1280T. Measured bass extension of 79Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 78dB.
Cons: Bass reaches -3dB around 79Hz, so deep extension should not be inferred from the overall flat trend. Listening-window response still has local irregularities, including lower-treble unevenness. The existing review reports rapidly increasing distortion and audible distress when pushed well above moderate desktop levels. No Bluetooth, and adding a subwoofer does not cure every output or tonal limitation.
Full Edifier MR4 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 42W RMS total (21W per speaker) |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 59Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 79Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9”H x 5.5”W x 7.6”D (228.6 x 139.7 x 193 mm) |
| Drivers | 4” (102mm) woofer, 1” silk dome tweeter |
| EQ | Yes (Monitor and Music modes) |
| Frequency Response | 60 Hz-20 kHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Headphone Output | Yes |
| Inputs | TRS Balanced, RCA, Aux |
| Optical Input | No |
| Outputs | Headphone |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Sensitivity | 78dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.25 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.00 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 9.9 lbs (4.5 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner Review Measurements More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1280DBs sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Edifier R1700BT sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Presonus Eris E3.5 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs iLoud Micro Monitor sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Presonus Eris E4.5 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier MR4 vs Mackie CR4-X sound.DEMO
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
- Jasper Tech: Are the iLoud Micro Monitor Pro the Best Studio Monitor Speakers for your Home Studio?
- Head-to-Head Comparisons