Short answer: the Juzear Harrier. Both are rated 3.6/5 for sound quality (#702 and #744 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Juzear Harrier costs $329.99 against $349 for the Penon Dome, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.
The case for the Juzear Harrier: The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 69 with a 2.15 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.8 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: Presence sits about 3.9 dB low with an 8.1 dB dip near 10.6 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
What the Penon Dome does well: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 69 against the Harman target. The catch: Treble about 6 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Buy the Juzear Harrier. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $19.01 less than the Penon Dome.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 69 with a 2.15 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.8 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $329.99 eBay
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 69 against the Harman target.
Amazon $349 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Juzear Harrier | Penon Dome | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $329.99 | $349 |
| Ranked | #702 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #744 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired (3.5mm / 4.4mm) |
| Driver Type | Tribrid | Hybrid |
| Drivers | 1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 2 x planar | 1 Dynamic, 3 Balanced Armature |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | - |
| Sensitivity | 112 dB/mW | - |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Harman Preference Score | 69 (median of 18 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 69 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.15 dB standard deviation | 2.40 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.98 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.30 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.3 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Juzear Harrier from aftersound, atechreviews, awsmdanny, bassaudio, bloomaudio, boizoff, ducbloke, eliseaudio, flare, gadgetgenerations, hobbytalk, jaytiss, obodio, practiphile, precog, soundcheck39, superreview and tonedeafmonk; the Penon Dome from flare, mmagtech, theaudiostore, tonedeafmonk and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Juzear Harrier: