Short answer: the BQEYZ Winter2. Both are rated 3.6/5 for sound quality (#737 and #702 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the BQEYZ Winter2 costs $319 against $329.99 for the Juzear Harrier, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.
Why pick the BQEYZ Winter2: A 12mm dynamic driver paired with a piezo bone conduction driver, with modular plugs. The tradeoff: Treble sits about 2.9 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance.
What the Juzear Harrier does well: The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 69 with a 2.15 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.8 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 3.9 dB low with an 8.1 dB dip near 10.6 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the BQEYZ Winter2. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $10.99 less than the Juzear Harrier.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
A 12mm dynamic driver paired with a piezo bone conduction driver, with modular plugs.
Amazon $319.00 eBay
The median of 18 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 69 with a 2.15 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.8 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $329.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Winter2 | Juzear Harrier | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $319.00 | $329.99 |
| Ranked | #737 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #702 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 12mm dynamic + 1 x bone conduction | 1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 2 x planar |
| Impedance | 40 ohms | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | 112 dB/mW |
| Harman Preference Score | 69 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 69 (median of 18 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.61 dB standard deviation | 2.15 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.04 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.98 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.9 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Frequency Response | - | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ Winter2 from aftersound, cqtek, digaoreviews, eplv and soundcheck39; the Juzear Harrier from aftersound, atechreviews, awsmdanny, bassaudio, bloomaudio, boizoff, ducbloke, eliseaudio, flare, gadgetgenerations, hobbytalk, jaytiss, obodio, practiphile, precog, soundcheck39, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Juzear Harrier compares with other leading options: