Short answer: the Simgot EA500LM. Both are rated 4.8/5 for sound quality (#21 and #25 of 450 in-ear headphones), and the Simgot EA500LM costs $101.99 against $119.99 for the Juzear 81T, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
What the Juzear 81T does well: With one dynamic driver and eight balanced armatures, the 81T measures a preference score of 84 in the median of six hobbyist measurements on squig.link, with only about 1.1 dB of unevenness. The catch: The air band from 10 to 16 kHz sits about 6.2 dB above target, so some listeners will hear an airy, slightly artificial shimmer, and the presence region is about 2.6 dB low with a dip near 3.9 kHz.
The case for the Simgot EA500LM: Squig.link measurements across 35 hobbyist samples give it a preference score of 83, with a lively, mildly V shaped balance that suits warm and V shaped tastes. The catch: Air from 10 to 16 kHz sits about 4 dB above target and there is a 4.8 dB peak near 8.1 kHz, so bright recordings and sibilant voices can sound edgy.
Buy the Simgot EA500LM. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $18 less than the Juzear 81T.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Juzear 81T | Simgot EA500LM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $119.99 | $101.99 |
| Ranked | #25 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones | #21 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 83 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 84 (median of 36 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.12 dB standard deviation | 1.11 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.16 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.17 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.8 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 8 balanced armature) | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 8 x balanced armature | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 21 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 117 dB | 123 dB/Vrms |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 10Hz - 50kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | No |
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Simgot EA500LM:
- EPZ Q5 vs Simgot EA500LM
- Simgot EA500LM vs Moondrop Golden Ages 2
- EPZ Q5 vs Juzear 81T
- TANGZU x AZLA Noir Blanc vs Juzear 81T
- Tin HiFi T7 vs SeeAudio Yume
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Headphones In Full
Juzear 81T: $119.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: With one dynamic driver and eight balanced armatures, the 81T measures a preference score of 84 in the median of six hobbyist measurements on squig.link, with only about 1.1 dB of unevenness. Sub-bass and bass land within a fraction of a dB of target, giving clean, full low end, and 117 dB sensitivity means a phone drives it easily. It suits listeners who like extra treble air with a warm foundation.
Cons: The air band from 10 to 16 kHz sits about 6.2 dB above target, so some listeners will hear an airy, slightly artificial shimmer, and the presence region is about 2.6 dB low with a dip near 3.9 kHz. There is no microphone, and the Simgot EA500LM earns the same rating for a bit less.
Full Juzear 81T review and specifications →
| Released | Nov 2024 (1 year ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.12 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 8 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 8 x balanced armature |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 83 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 117 dB |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.8 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.16 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Simgot EA500LM: $101.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: Squig.link measurements across 35 hobbyist samples give it a preference score of 83, with a lively, mildly V shaped balance that suits warm and V shaped tastes. Upper bass sits about 2 dB above target, giving punchy drums and full bass lines, and the presence region is right on target, so vocals stay clear. The single 10 mm dynamic driver at 123 dB/Vrms gets loud from any phone. It shares its rating with the pricier Simgot SuperMix 4.
Cons: Air from 10 to 16 kHz sits about 4 dB above target and there is a 4.8 dB peak near 8.1 kHz, so bright recordings and sibilant voices can sound edgy. The extra upper bass slightly thickens the lower midrange, and there is no built-in microphone.
Full Simgot EA500LM review and specifications →
| Back | Closed |
|---|---|
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.11 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 10Hz - 50kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 84 (median of 36 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 21 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 123 dB/Vrms |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.17 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons