JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Soundcore 3

Last updated: October 3, 2026

Short answer: the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE if sound quality matters most, the Soundcore 3 if price matters most. The JBL Charge Essential 3 SE ranks #41 of 157 medium speakers, rated 3.7/5, at $199.95. The Soundcore 3 ranks #62, rated 3.4/5, at $59.99, $139.96 cheaper.

JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Soundcore 3

The JBL Charge Essential 3 SE is the better-sounding pick. Gets louder than the Bose SoundLink Flex 2nd Gen and digs deeper in the bass, with a separate 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators and 40W of amplification in the familiar Charge body. Watch for: In side-by-side listening against the Charge 6, its bass is weaker and less stable and distorts on bass-heavy tracks even with the bass turned down in the app, while a narrow boost in the upper mids makes it sound less natural.

The Soundcore 3 is the lighter option. Identical in acoustic design and performance to the retailer variant Soundcore Select 2. At 0.8 lbs (372 g) it weighs much less than the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE at 2.1 lbs (960 g). It plays in stereo from a single unit, unlike the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE.

Buy the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Soundcore 3 if the price matters more than sound quality.

Still deciding? The full Portable Bluetooth rankings cover every ranked option.

Specifications Side By Side

JBL Charge Essential 3 SE Soundcore 3
Price$199.95$59.99
Ranked#41 of 157 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers#62 of 157 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers
AppYesYes
Aux InputNoNo
Battery Life20 hours (Manufacturer specified)24 hours (Manufacturer specified)
Built-in MicrophoneNo-
EQYesYes
IP RatingIP67IPX7
Party ModeYes (Auracast)Yes (PartyCast up to 100 speakers)
Power BankYes (USB-C)-
StereoNoYes
OmnidirectionalNoNo
TWSYes (Auracast)Yes
Weight2.1 lbs (960 g)0.8 lbs (372 g)
BluetoothYesYes
Bluetooth Version5.45.0
Bluetooth CodecsSBC, AAC, LC3SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified)
Dimensions8.8” x 3.8” x 3.7” (223 x 96.5 x 94 mm)6.9” x 2.2” x 2.3” (174 x 57 x 59 mm)
Drivers52mm x 90mm racetrack woofer, 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators2x 38mm (1.5”) titanium diaphragm full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators
Amplifier Power40W total (30W woofer + 10W tweeter)16W
Frequency Response60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)-
Power InputUSB-C (5V/3A)USB-C
Digital Aux InputNoNo
StrapNoNo
Bass Extension (-10dB)-60Hz
Bluetooth Latency-180ms
Maximum SPL-99dB (measured by Alan Ross Reviews)

More top alternatives to JBL Charge Essential 3 SE:

Prices on this page were last checked October 2, 2026 at 10:18 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

JBL Charge Essential 3 SE: $199.95 JBL eBay

JBL Charge Essential 3 SE ranking card

Older models: the JBL Charge Essential 2 (ranked higher, rated 3.8/5) and the JBL Charge Essential (ranked lower, rated 3.2/5).

Pros: Gets louder than the Bose SoundLink Flex 2nd Gen and digs deeper in the bass, with a separate 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators and 40W of amplification in the familiar Charge body. IP67 water and dust protection, a claimed 20 hours of battery life, a USB-C power bank output, Auracast stereo pairing and multi-speaker linking, Bluetooth 5.4 with AAC, and app EQ.

Cons: In side-by-side listening against the Charge 6, its bass is weaker and less stable and distorts on bass-heavy tracks even with the bass turned down in the app, while a narrow boost in the upper mids makes it sound less natural. Against the Bose SoundLink Flex 2nd Gen it sounds muddier and more strident, with less detail and a smaller soundstage. At full price it costs as much as the Charge 6, which is the better speaker.

Amplifier Power40W total (30W woofer + 10W tweeter)
AppYes
Aux InputNo
Battery Life20 hours (Manufacturer specified)
BluetoothYes
Bluetooth CodecsSBC, AAC, LC3
Bluetooth Version5.4
Built-in MicrophoneNo
Digital Aux InputNo
Dimensions8.8” x 3.8” x 3.7” (223 x 96.5 x 94 mm)
Drivers52mm x 90mm racetrack woofer, 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators
EQYes
Frequency Response60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
IP RatingIP67
OmnidirectionalNo
Party ModeYes (Auracast)
Power BankYes (USB-C)
Power InputUSB-C (5V/3A)
StereoNo
StrapNo
TWSYes (Auracast)
Weight2.1 lbs (960 g)

Soundcore 3: $59.99 Amazon eBay

Soundcore 3 ranking card

Older model: the Soundcore 2 (ranked lower, rated 3/5).

Pros: Soundcore 3 uses 2x 38mm (1.5”) titanium diaphragm full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators. Its 372 g, claimed 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) battery life, IPX7 protection, up to 99dB and stereo playback make it a practical option for its intended room or portable use. Identical in acoustic design and performance to the retailer variant Soundcore Select 2. Measured bass extension of 60Hz (-10dB).

Cons: Bass is limited by its 60Hz specification.

Amplifier Power16W
AppYes
Aux InputNo
Bass Extension (-10dB)60Hz
Battery Life24 hours (Manufacturer specified)
BluetoothYes
Bluetooth CodecsSBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified)
Bluetooth Latency180ms
Bluetooth Version5.0
Digital Aux InputNo
Dimensions6.9” x 2.2” x 2.3” (174 x 57 x 59 mm)
Drivers2x 38mm (1.5”) titanium diaphragm full-range drivers + 2x passive radiators
EQYes
IP RatingIPX7
Maximum SPL99dB (measured by Alan Ross Reviews)
OmnidirectionalNo
Party ModeYes (PartyCast up to 100 speakers)
Power InputUSB-C
StereoYes
StrapNo
TWSYes
Weight0.8 lbs (372 g)