Short answer: the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE for better sound quality, the Oontz Angle 3 for the lower price. The JBL Charge Essential 3 SE ranks #40 of 150 medium speakers, rated 3.7/5, at $199.95. The Oontz Angle 3 ranks #146, rated 2.1/5, at $28, $171.95 cheaper.
The case for the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE: Gets louder than the Bose SoundLink Flex 2nd Gen and digs deeper in the bass, with a separate 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators and 40W of amplification in the familiar Charge body. The tradeoff: In side-by-side listening against the Charge 6, its bass is weaker and less stable and distorts on bass-heavy tracks even with the bass turned down in the app, while a narrow boost in the upper mids makes it sound less natural.
The case for the Oontz Angle 3: At 580 g, Oontz Angle 3 combines 2x precision acoustic drivers + 1x passive bass radiator with Bluetooth and aux. The catch: Bass is limited by its 138Hz specification.
Buy the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE when sound quality outweighs the price for you, and the Oontz Angle 3 when the price outweighs sound quality instead.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| JBL Charge Essential 3 SE | Oontz Angle 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.95 | $28 |
| Ranked | #40 of 150 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #146 of 150 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | Yes | - |
| Aux Input | No | Yes |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 14 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | Yes |
| EQ | Yes | - |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IPX5 |
| Party Mode | Yes (Auracast) | - |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) | - |
| Stereo | No | Yes |
| Omnidirectional | No | No |
| TWS | Yes (Auracast) | No |
| Weight | 2.1 lbs (960 g) | 1.3 lbs (580 g) |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3 | SBC |
| Dimensions | 8.8” x 3.8” x 3.7” (223 x 96.5 x 94 mm) | 5.3” x 2.6” x 2.8” (133.4 x 66 x 71.1 mm) |
| Drivers | 52mm x 90mm racetrack woofer, 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators | 2x precision acoustic drivers + 1x passive bass radiator |
| Amplifier Power | 40W total (30W woofer + 10W tweeter) | 12W |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Power Input | USB-C (5V/3A) | Micro USB |
| Digital Aux Input | No | No |
| Strap | No | - |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | - | 138Hz |
| Maximum SPL | - | 89dB (Manufacturer specified) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to JBL Charge Essential 3 SE:
- Earfun Uboom L vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
- Soundcore Motion 300 vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
- Minirig 4 vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
- JBL Charge 6 vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
JBL Charge Essential 3 SE: $199.95 JBL eBay
Older models: the JBL Charge Essential 2 (ranked higher, rated 3.8/5) and the JBL Charge Essential (ranked lower, rated 3.2/5).
Pros: Gets louder than the Bose SoundLink Flex 2nd Gen and digs deeper in the bass, with a separate 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators and 40W of amplification in the familiar Charge body. IP67 water and dust protection, a claimed 20 hours of battery life, a USB-C power bank output, Auracast stereo pairing and multi-speaker linking, Bluetooth 5.4 with AAC, and app EQ.
Cons: In side-by-side listening against the Charge 6, its bass is weaker and less stable and distorts on bass-heavy tracks even with the bass turned down in the app, while a narrow boost in the upper mids makes it sound less natural. Against the Bose SoundLink Flex 2nd Gen it sounds muddier and more strident, with less detail and a smaller soundstage. At full price it costs as much as the Charge 6, which is the better speaker.
Full JBL Charge Essential 3 SE review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 40W total (30W woofer + 10W tweeter) |
|---|---|
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | No |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 8.8” x 3.8” x 3.7” (223 x 96.5 x 94 mm) |
| Drivers | 52mm x 90mm racetrack woofer, 20mm tweeter, two passive radiators |
| EQ | Yes |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Auracast) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) |
| Power Input | USB-C (5V/3A) |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | Yes (Auracast) |
| Weight | 2.1 lbs (960 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Earfun Uboom Slim
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs JBL Charge Essential 2
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Bose Soundlink Flex
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Xiaomi Sound Outdoor
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs JBL Pulse 5
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs Tribit Xsound Plus 2
- JBL Charge Essential 3 SE vs W-King D320
- See all 85 comparisons
Oontz Angle 3: $28 Amazon eBay
Pros: At 580 g, Oontz Angle 3 combines 2x precision acoustic drivers + 1x passive bass radiator with Bluetooth and aux. Claimed 14 hours (manufacturer specified) battery life, ipx5 protection, up to 89db and single-box playback make its feature set practical for its intended room or portable use. Measured bass extension of 138Hz (-10dB).
Cons: Bass is limited by its 138Hz specification. There is no companion app. No EQ adjustment.
Full Oontz Angle 3 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 12W |
|---|---|
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 138Hz |
| Battery Life | 14 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 5.3” x 2.6” x 2.8” (133.4 x 66 x 71.1 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x precision acoustic drivers + 1x passive bass radiator |
| IP Rating | IPX5 |
| Maximum SPL | 89dB (Manufacturer specified) |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Power Input | Micro USB |
| Stereo | Yes |
| TWS | No |
| Weight | 1.3 lbs (580 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- No independent measurement review is linked for this model; it is ranked from hands-on listening and comparison against similarly priced speakers.
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Ultimate Ears Megaboom 4
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Tribit Stormbox Mini+
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Marshall Emberton II
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Marshall Emberton III
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Ultimate Ears Boom 4
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Soundcore 2
- Oontz Angle 3 vs Tribit Xsound Go
- See all 32 comparisons