Short answer: the JBL Charge Essential 2 on measured sound quality, the Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus on price. The JBL Charge Essential 2 ranks #37 of 150 medium speakers, rated 3.8/5, at $130. The Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus ranks #75, rated 3.3/5, at $49.99, $80.01 cheaper.
What the JBL Charge Essential 2 does well: A tough, compact 930g speaker with IPX7 water resistance, USB-C charging, a USB-A power-bank output and a claimed 20-hour battery life. The tradeoff: It is a pared-back Charge: no app EQ, no PartyBoost/party mode and no stereo-pair option.
The case for the Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus: A racetrack woofer and a tweeter rated for 50W, with IPX7 waterproofing, Bluetooth 6.0, Auracast multi-speaker sync, stereo pairing, USB-C audio input, app EQ and a detachable lanyard, at 0.81 kg. The tradeoff: In side by side tests by Clinch Audio Bass and Mateusz Cholewa, the Xiaomi Sound Party and Soundcore Boom 3i sounded more refined and fuller, and listeners described the C3 Plus’s treble as dull.
Buy the JBL Charge Essential 2 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus if the price matters more than sound quality.
There is a real battery-life gap here: the JBL Charge Essential 2 is rated for 20 hours, the Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus only 12 hours.
Want more options? Browse the full Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| JBL Charge Essential 2 | Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $130 | $49.99 |
| Ranked | #37 of 150 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #75 of 150 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | No | Yes (Tronsmart) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | ~55Hz | - |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 12 hours at 50% volume (Manufacturer specified) |
| EQ | No | Yes (app) |
| Party Mode | No | Yes (Auracast) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-A) | - |
| Stereo | No | No |
| Omnidirectional | No | No |
| Weight | 2.1 lbs (930 g) | 1.8 lbs (0.81 kg) |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| Dimensions | 8.8” x 3.8” x 3.7” (223 x 96.5 x 94 mm) | 8.3”H x 3.1”W x 3.3”D (210 x 80 x 85 mm) |
| Drivers | 53mm x 93mm woofer, 20mm tweeter | 1x racetrack woofer + 1x tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Amplifier Power | 40W | 50W |
| Digital Aux Input | No | Yes (USB-C) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) | SBC |
| Aux Input | No | - |
| TWS | No | Yes |
| Strap | No | Yes (lanyard) |
| Charging Time | - | 4 hours |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for JBL Charge Essential 2:
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Earfun Uboom L
- Soundcore Motion 300 vs JBL Charge Essential 2
- Soundcore Motion+ vs JBL Charge Essential 2
- Soundcore Boost “upgraded” 2021 vs JBL Charge Essential 2
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Minirig 4
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
JBL Charge Essential 2: $130 eBay
Newer model: the JBL Charge Essential 3 SE, ranked lower, rated 3.7/5.
Pros: A tough, compact 930g speaker with IPX7 water resistance, USB-C charging, a USB-A power-bank output and a claimed 20-hour battery life. It delivers much of the Charge 5’s familiar punch and volume in a simpler package, with bass that reaches roughly 55Hz for this size. Measured bass extension of ~55Hz (-10dB).
Cons: It is a pared-back Charge: no app EQ, no PartyBoost/party mode and no stereo-pair option. It plays mono, has a little less bass authority than the Charge 5, and its IPX7 rating does not promise dust protection. Choose it for a good sale price, not for extra features.
Full JBL Charge Essential 2 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 40W |
|---|---|
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | ~55Hz |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.1 |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 8.8” x 3.8” x 3.7” (223 x 96.5 x 94 mm) |
| Drivers | 53mm x 93mm woofer, 20mm tweeter |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IPX7 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | No |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-A) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | No |
| Weight | 2.1 lbs (930 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Bose Soundlink Flex
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Huawei Sound Joy
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Bose Soundlink Flex 2nd gen
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Tribit Xsound Plus 2
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs JBL Charge Essential 3 SE
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Teufel Rockster XS
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Earfun Uboom Slim
- JBL Charge Essential 2 vs Soundcore Motion 100
- See all 135 comparisons
Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus: $49.99 Tronsmart Best Buy eBay
Pros: A racetrack woofer and a tweeter rated for 50W, with IPX7 waterproofing, Bluetooth 6.0, Auracast multi-speaker sync, stereo pairing, USB-C audio input, app EQ and a detachable lanyard, at 0.81 kg.
Cons: In side by side tests by Clinch Audio Bass and Mateusz Cholewa, the Xiaomi Sound Party and Soundcore Boom 3i sounded more refined and fuller, and listeners described the C3 Plus’s treble as dull. Tronsmart rates the battery at only 12 hours at half volume. It is a mono unit with no aux input.
Full Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 50W |
|---|---|
| App | Yes (Tronsmart) |
| Battery Life | 12 hours at 50% volume (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 6.0 |
| Charging Time | 4 hours |
| Digital Aux Input | Yes (USB-C) |
| Dimensions | 8.3”H x 3.1”W x 3.3”D (210 x 80 x 85 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x racetrack woofer + 1x tweeter |
| EQ | Yes (app) |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IPX7 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Auracast) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | Yes (lanyard) |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.8 lbs (0.81 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Clinch Audio Bass: Mirtune C3 Plus 50w VS Xioami Sound Party 50w
- Clinch Audio Bass: Mirtune C3 Plus 50w VS SoundCore Boom 3i 50w
- Techder Audios: Xiaomi Sound Party vs Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus - Real Sound & Bass Test! More from techderaudios →
- Mateusz Cholewa: Soundcore Boom 3i vs Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus More from Mateusz Cholewa →
- Importados Neto Rocha: Vale a pena pagar o dobro? Tronsmart C3 Plus vs JBL Flip 7
- GiT: Tronsmart Mirtune C3 vs C3+ blind test
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs Klipsch Nashville
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs JBL Charge 3
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs JBL Charge Essential
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs JBL Flip Essential 2
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs JBL Flip 5
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs Tronsmart Mirtune S100
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs JBL Grip
- Tronsmart Mirtune C3 Plus vs Sony ULT Field 1
- See all 33 comparisons