Short answer: the intime Miyabi MarkII. Both are rated 3.8/5 for sound quality (#624 and #581 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the intime Miyabi MarkII costs $307.21 against $339.99 for the Yanyin Canon Pro, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.
Why pick the intime Miyabi MarkII: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 71 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: Treble about 4 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
What the Yanyin Canon Pro does well: The median of 12 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.11 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 6.2 dB low with an 8 dB dip near 5.4 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the intime Miyabi MarkII. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $32.78 less than the Yanyin Canon Pro.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 71 against the Harman target.
Amazon $307.21 eBay
The median of 12 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.11 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Linsoul $339.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| intime Miyabi MarkII | Yanyin Canon Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $307.21 | $339.99 |
| Ranked | #624 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #581 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 71 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 71 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.36 dB standard deviation | 2.11 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.25 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.29 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.9 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired (3.5mm) | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Drivers | 1 Dynamic, 1 Piezoelectric (VST2) | 1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | - | 18 ohms |
| Frequency Response | - | 20Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the intime Miyabi MarkII from bryaudioreviews, freeryder05, lown-fi and smirk; the Yanyin Canon Pro from audioamigo, boizoff, breampike, dl, gadgetrytech, hbb, iemocean, joycesreview, silicagel, soundcheck39, soundignity and superreview, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Yanyin Canon Pro compares with other leading options: