Short answer: the Infinity Reference R162 for better sound quality, the Behringer B2030P for the lower price. The Infinity Reference R162 ranks #51 of 100 bookshelf speakers at $500. The Behringer B2030P ranks #57 at $220, $280 cheaper.
On the Infinity Reference R162 side: CEA2034 spinorama shows good directivity with wide, consistent horizontal and vertical response, and blended early reflections that need little room treatment. Set against that: Elevated output above 3kHz adds brightness, with a resonance around 700Hz and some distortion near the crossover point.
What the Behringer B2030P offers: CEA2034 spinorama shows strong horizontal directivity control, keeping the response nearly constant off-axis through most of the audible spectrum, with a wide beamwidth that eases seating position and toe-in requirements. Watch for: A resonance around 800Hz shows up clearly in the on-axis response and the waterfall/CSD plot, and the flat, near-horizontal predicted in-room response makes it sound bright without an equalization target curve.
Buy the Infinity Reference R162 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Behringer B2030P if the price matters more than sound quality.
Specifications Side By Side
| Infinity Reference R162 | Behringer B2030P | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500 Discontinued | $220 Discontinued |
| Ranked | #51 of 100 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #57 of 100 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 78Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 79Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Discontinued | Yes | Yes |
| Sensitivity | 87dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) | 84.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal | - |
| Frequency Response | 49Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 75Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Drivers | 1" CMMD tweeter with waveguide, 6.5" CMMD woofer | 6.75" woofer, 0.75" ferrofluid-cooled tweeter |
| Weight | 17.6 lbs / 8 kg each | 15.4 lbs / 7.0 kg each |
| Dimensions | 15.5"H x 7.9"W x 11.2"D (394 x 200 x 285 mm) | 12.5H x 8.4W x 8.3D in |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported | ported, vertical slot |
| Power Handling | - | up to 100W |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:
- JBL Studio 630 vs Infinity IL10
- JBL Studio 630 vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs JBL Studio 630
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs Behringer B2030P
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Infinity IL10
The Two Speakers In Full
Infinity Reference R162: $500 Discontinued Bhphotovideo
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows good directivity with wide, consistent horizontal and vertical response, and blended early reflections that need little room treatment. 1” CMMD waveguide tweeter and 6.5” CMMD woofer, 85.5dB sensitivity.
Cons: Elevated output above 3kHz adds brightness, with a resonance around 700Hz and some distortion near the crossover point. EQ or a simple inline tweeter resistor can tame the treble; the reviewer still called it a very enjoyable system for the price. Discontinued.
Full Infinity Reference R162 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 78Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Dimensions | 15.5"H x 7.9"W x 11.2"D (394 x 200 x 285 mm) |
| Discontinued | Yes |
| Drivers | 1" CMMD tweeter with waveguide, 6.5" CMMD woofer |
| Frequency Response | 49Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 87dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Weight | 17.6 lbs / 8 kg each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported |
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Infinity Reference R162 vs SVS Ultra Bookshelf
- Infinity Reference R162 vs JBL Studio 630
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Dynaudio Contour 20i
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Definitive Technology Demand D11
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Infinity IL10
- Infinity Reference R162 vs Yamaha NS-800A
- See all 9 comparisons
Behringer B2030P: $220 Discontinued
Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows strong horizontal directivity control, keeping the response nearly constant off-axis through most of the audible spectrum, with a wide beamwidth that eases seating position and toe-in requirements. Distortion measurements hold up well against the pricier Revel M106 at both 86dB and 106dB SPL. With EQ to tame a resonance around 800Hz and a bit of a bass fill, the reviewer called it a “winner” that could play loud without bottoming out.
Cons: A resonance around 800Hz shows up clearly in the on-axis response and the waterfall/CSD plot, and the flat, near-horizontal predicted in-room response makes it sound bright without an equalization target curve. Vertical directivity is only typical, not exceptional. Long discontinued - the reviewer noted you’ll have to hunt for a used pair. Discontinued.
Full Behringer B2030P review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 79Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Dimensions | 12.5H x 8.4W x 8.3D in |
| Discontinued | Yes |
| Drivers | 6.75" woofer, 0.75" ferrofluid-cooled tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 75Hz - 21kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Power Handling | up to 100W |
| Sensitivity | 84.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Weight | 15.4 lbs / 7.0 kg each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, vertical slot |
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Behringer B2030P vs JBL Studio 630
- Behringer B2030P vs Infinity IL10
- Behringer B2030P vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Behringer B2030P vs Klipsch RP-600M II
- Behringer B2030P vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- Behringer B2030P vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- Behringer B2030P vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- Behringer B2030P vs KEF Q3 Meta
- See all 9 comparisons