Short answer: the ELAC UBR62 for a true three-way midrange, the Klipsch RP-600M II if you can toe it out. The UBR62’s concentric 4-inch midrange and dedicated 6.5-inch aluminum woofer make it a genuine three-way, but Erin measured just 83dB/2.83V/1m sensitivity and had to step up to a more powerful HINT 6. The Klipsch’s redesigned waveguide sits flush to the baffle edge and cuts diffraction, but its on-axis treble runs notably hot and needs about 20 degrees of toe-out or the grille.
Buy the ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Klipsch RP-600M II if the price matters more than sound quality.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 | Klipsch RP-600M II | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,199 per pair | $449.99 per pair |
| Ranked | #54 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #75 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension | 41Hz manufacturer specified; Erin’s response-linearity graph shows limited high-output bass headroom | - |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 58.6Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 41.9Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 41Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 83dB/2.83V/1m (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 86dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms minimum near 50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 1” tweeter coaxial with 4” midrange; 6.5” woofer | 6.5” Cerametallic cone woofer, 1” titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn |
| Dimensions | 14.1”H x 8.2”W x 13.1”D | 15.7”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, dual front slot vents | ported |
| Weight | 23.5 lbs (10.68 kg) each | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.44 (measured, spinorama.org) | 5.64 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.7 (measured, spinorama.org) | 7.77 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62:
- AsciLab C6B vs ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62
- KEF R3 Meta vs ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62
- KEF Q Concerto Meta vs ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62
- KEF R3 vs ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62
- Ascend Acoustics CMT-340 SE2 vs ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62
Prices on this page were last checked October 3, 2026 at 10:26 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62: $1,199 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: True three-way stand-mount using a 1-inch tweeter concentrically mounted in a 4-inch aluminum midrange plus a dedicated 6.5-inch aluminum woofer. Erin found the directivity and overall tonality well controlled, with dual front slot vents minimizing placement sensitivity and cabinet bracing suppressing obvious coloration. The mostly 5-ohm-or-higher load is manageable for a genuinely 4-ohm-capable amplifier, and the coherent concentric upper range supports stable imaging across seats. Measured bass extension of 58.6Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 83dB.
Cons: Erin measured very low 83dB/2.83V/1m sensitivity; his 110W Parasound was insufficient for the high-level test and the more powerful HINT 6 was needed. Impedance reaches 4 ohms near 50Hz (Erin), while woofer excursion and bass output were less capable than expected for the cabinet size. A broad 500-700Hz rise and associated lower/female-vocal coloration were audible, and the slightly subdued listening-window treble is necessary to avoid an overly bright in-room balance rather than evidence of ruler-flat axial tuning.
Full ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension | 41Hz manufacturer specified; Erin’s response-linearity graph shows limited high-output bass headroom |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 41.9Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 58.6Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 14.1”H x 8.2”W x 13.1”D |
| Drivers | 1” tweeter coaxial with 4” midrange; 6.5” woofer |
| Impedance | 4 ohms minimum near 50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 83dB/2.83V/1m (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.44 (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.7 (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 23.5 lbs (10.68 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, dual front slot vents |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs Power Sound Audio MT-110-M
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs ELAC DBR62
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs Revel Concerta2 M16
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs Yamaha NS-800A
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs Definitive Technology Demand D11
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs Technics SB-C700
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs Dynaudio Contour 20i
- ELAC Uni-Fi Reference UBR62 vs JBL HDI-1600
- See all 25 comparisons
Klipsch RP-600M II: $449.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Older model: the Klipsch RP-600M (ranked lower, rated 2.9/5).
Pros: Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. Roughly 10-20° wider horizontal radiation than the original, giving more soundstage envelopment while retaining precise imaging. A major step up in overall tonal neutrality compared to the original RP-600M, largely eliminating that model’s midrange resonance issues. Unusually, sounds better with the grille on: the grille smooths out the elevated treble rather than degrading the sound, a rare trait among speakers the reviewer has tested. More refined back-panel hardware, including anodized binding posts and jumper cables for optional bi-amping. Responds well to EQ correction (verified using measurement software and a miniDSP), letting the on-axis response be made genuinely linear. Measured bass extension of 70Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86dB.
Cons: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot (even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects) and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced. Horizontal dispersion is very slightly less linear across angles than the original RP-600M, a minor trade-off for the wider overall radiation pattern. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity (about 94.5dB) is, like the original, a half-space rating roughly 9dB above the anechoic reality (closer to 85-86dB). In-room bass rolls off around 60Hz in practice, and a 120Hz boost paired with a midrange scoop gives kick drums their “tambour” without real low-end weight: a subwoofer is still recommended. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Toeing the speaker out for better on-axis tonality (rather than using the grille) introduces slightly more diffuse imaging from added sidewall reflections.
Full Klipsch RP-600M II review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 41Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 70Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 15.7”H x 8”W x 12.5”D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 6.5” Cerametallic cone woofer, 1” titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 86dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.64 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.77 |
| Weight | 13 lbs (5.9 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: The Truth about Klipsch’s “NEW” Sound. RP-600M Update. More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner Website Klipsch RP-600M II
- GR-Research: We Bought The "NEW" RP-600M II Is KLIPSCH Listening?! More from GR-Research →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: 5 AWESOME SPEAKERS Under $1000 You Won’t Regret
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Erin’s Audio Corner: KEF Q1 Meta vs Emotiva vs Klipsch | The Real Differences
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs Aoshida Audio Musician Knight I V2
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs JBL 708i
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs PS Audio Aspen FR5
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs Philharmonic BMR Monitor
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs Theory Audio sb25
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs JBL Studio 630
- Klipsch RP-600M II vs Polk Signature Elite ES20
- See all 117 comparisons