Short answer: the Edifier M60. It ranks #6 of 24 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 4.0/5, at $199.99. The Fluid Audio C35BT ranks #19, rated 3.0/5, at $139, $60.99 cheaper, a saving that is not big enough to make up the sound-quality gap.
Why pick the Edifier M60: Erin’s Klippel data shows a reasonably even midrange, spanning 2.8dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with broad horizontal coverage for desktop listening. The tradeoff: The on-axis response rises by about 0.57dB per octave, so the tonal balance becomes brighter toward the treble.
What the Fluid Audio C35BT does well: Balanced TRS inputs, Bluetooth, front volume control and a headphone output make this inexpensive pair practical for a basic desktop setup. Watch for: Preference scores of 2.57 standalone and 5.57 with an ideal subwoofer indicate that the limitations are not just missing bass.
Buy the Edifier M60. It is rated higher for sound quality, and saving $60.99 with the Fluid Audio C35BT does not make up for the sound-quality gap.
Want more options? Browse the full Powered Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Edifier M60 | Fluid Audio C35BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.99 per pair | $139 per pair |
| Ranked | #6 of 24 in Small Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #19 of 24 in Small Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| App | Yes | - |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, 5.0 |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, LDAC | - |
| Dimensions | 6.6”H x 3.9”W x 5.8”D (167.6 x 99.1 x 147.3 mm) | 7.3H x 4.9W x 5.9D in |
| EQ | Yes | - |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, Aux, USB-C | Bluetooth, RCA, 3.5mm, balanced TRS |
| Drivers | 3” woofer, 1” silk dome tweeter | 0.8” silk-dome tweeter, 3.5” composite woofer |
| Weight | 6.6 lbs (3 kg) | 10 lbs (4.52 kg) pair |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | - |
| Frequency Response | 55Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 80Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Sensitivity | 87.5dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Amplifier Power | 66W total (33W per speaker) | 64W total |
| Maximum SPL | 96dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.60 | 2.57 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.33 | 5.57 |
| XLR Input | No | No |
| RCA Input | No | Yes |
| TRS Input | No | Yes |
| Optical Input | No | No |
| Coaxial Input | No | No |
| USB Input | Yes | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | No |
| Aux Input | Yes | Yes |
| Enclosure | - | Powered 2-way, front-ported |
| Outputs | - | Headphone |
| Headphone Output | - | Yes |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Edifier M60:
- Audio Smile Little British Monitor vs Edifier M60
- Edifier M60 vs Genelec 8010A
- Adam Audio D3v vs Edifier M60
- Edifier M60 vs Cambridge Audio L/R S
- Edifier M60 vs IK Multimedia iLoud Micro Monitor
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Edifier M60: $199.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: Erin’s Klippel data shows a reasonably even midrange, spanning 2.8dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with broad horizontal coverage for desktop listening. Predicted preference scores are 4.60 standalone and 7.33 with an ideal subwoofer, a comparatively strong result in this compact category. USB-C, auxiliary input, Bluetooth and included angled stands make it easy to integrate into a small desk setup. LDAC Bluetooth support and illuminated touch controls round out the features. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87.5dB.
Cons: The on-axis response rises by about 0.57dB per octave, so the tonal balance becomes brighter toward the treble. Measured -3dB bass extension is about 70Hz; it cannot reproduce deep bass at full level. Sitting below the tweeter axis worsens the crossover-region response. Limiting and compression constrain louder playback, so use it nearfield rather than expecting room-filling output.
Full Edifier M60 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 66W total (33W per speaker) |
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 57Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, LDAC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 6.6”H x 3.9”W x 5.8”D (167.6 x 99.1 x 147.3 mm) |
| Drivers | 3” woofer, 1” silk dome tweeter |
| EQ | Yes |
| Frequency Response | 55Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, Aux, USB-C |
| Maximum SPL | 96dB @ 1m (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Sensitivity | 87.5dB (measured at 0.3V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.60 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.33 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 6.6 lbs (3 kg) |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Edifier M60 Desktop Speaker Delivers Big Fun! More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: The Best Budget Desktop Speakers, Tested & Rated
- Erin’s Audio Corner Website: Edifier M60
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Jasper Tech: Best Desktop Computer Speakers for Every Budget – 2026 More from Jasper Tech →
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Edifier M60 vs IK Multimedia iLoud Micro Monitor
- Edifier M60 vs HiVi Swan X3
- Edifier M60 vs Edifier MR3
- Edifier M60 vs Cambridge Audio L/R S
- Edifier M60 vs Adam Audio D3v
- Edifier M60 vs Sovox MiniMax3
- Edifier M60 vs Genelec 8010A
- Edifier M60 vs Audio Smile Little British Monitor
- See all 32 comparisons
Fluid Audio C35BT: $139 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: Balanced TRS inputs, Bluetooth, front volume control and a headphone output make this inexpensive pair practical for a basic desktop setup. ASR’s measured -3dB point is about 78Hz, so it covers more upper bass than the shallowest-reaching mini speakers.
Cons: Preference scores of 2.57 standalone and 5.57 with an ideal subwoofer indicate that the limitations are not just missing bass. Listening-window narrow-band deviation of 0.555 and sound-power deviation of 0.657 show that response irregularities affect both direct and room-reflected sound. A subwoofer cannot correct those tonal problems, and the small drivers are not a basis for expecting high clean output.
Full Fluid Audio C35BT review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 64W total |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.0 |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 7.3H x 4.9W x 5.9D in |
| Drivers | 0.8” silk-dome tweeter, 3.5” composite woofer |
| Enclosure | Powered 2-way, front-ported |
| Frequency Response | 80Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Headphone Output | Yes |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, RCA, 3.5mm, balanced TRS |
| Optical Input | No |
| Outputs | Headphone |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 2.57 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.57 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 10 lbs (4.52 kg) pair |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Mackie CR3-X
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Fiio SP3
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs M-Audio BX3
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Audioengine HD3
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Monoprice Monolith MM-3
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Presonus Eris E3.5 2nd Gen
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Midiplus MI3 II
- Fluid Audio C35BT vs Klipsch ProMedia Lumina
- See all 13 comparisons