Short answer: the Rose Technics Ceramics. Both are rated 3.8/5 for sound quality (#558 and #548 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Rose Technics Ceramics costs $39.99 against $44.99 for the DUNU Titan X, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.
Why pick the DUNU Titan X: The median of 25 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 72 with a 2.00 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: A 4.5 dB peak near 10.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
The case for the Rose Technics Ceramics: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 72 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: An uneven response, 2.2 dB standard deviation from target.
Buy the Rose Technics Ceramics. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $5 less than the DUNU Titan X.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
The median of 25 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 72 with a 2.00 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $44.99 eBay
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 72 against the Harman target.
Amazon $39.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| DUNU Titan X | Rose Technics Ceramics | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $44.99 | $39.99 |
| Ranked | #548 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #558 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 72 (median of 25 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 72 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.00 dB standard deviation | 2.16 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.63 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.50 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.6 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-3.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | True Wireless |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | - |
| Sensitivity | 123 dB/Vrms | - |
| Weight | 0 lbs (13 g) per earbud | - |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the DUNU Titan X from aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, boizoff, cqtek, ducbloke, elrics, enemyspider, eplv, fahryst, fernandagunsan, filk, hbb, hobbytalk, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, lumerion, practiphile, precog, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview and tonedeafmonk; the Rose Technics Ceramics from achoreviews, audioamigo, musicafe, pw and soundignity, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for DUNU Titan X: