Short answer: the Kiwi Ears Etude. Both are rated 3.8/5 for sound quality (#574 and #557 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Kiwi Ears Etude costs $119 against $129 for the Canpur Silver Flash, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
The case for the Canpur Silver Flash: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 72 against the Harman target. The catch: An uneven response, 1.9 dB standard deviation from target.
Why pick the Kiwi Ears Etude: The median of 17 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: Presence sits about 4.7 dB low with a 5.8 dB dip near 4.0 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the Kiwi Ears Etude. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $10 less than the Canpur Silver Flash.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 72 against the Harman target.
Addicted To Audio $129 eBay
The median of 17 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Linsoul $119 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Canpur Silver Flash | Kiwi Ears Etude | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $129 | $119 |
| Ranked | #557 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #574 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 72 (median of 8 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 71 (median of 17 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.92 dB standard deviation | 2.05 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.68 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.66 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.5 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature) | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x dynamic + 2 x balanced armature | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 3 x balanced armature + 1 x vibration transducer |
| Impedance | - | 5 ohms |
| Sensitivity | - | 104 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | - | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Canpur Silver Flash from aden, eliseaudio, elrics, hbb, lestat, practiphile, superreview and tonedeafmonk; the Kiwi Ears Etude from aden, aftersound, arn, atechreviews, audioamigo, avishai, bassaudio, fahryst, flare, hadoe, hbb, jaytiss, joycesreview, lumerion, silicagel, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Canpur Silver Flash: