Short answer: the BQEYZ Winter. Both are rated 3.3/5 for sound quality (#910 and #919 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the BQEYZ Winter costs $239 against $279 for the ZiiGaat x Fresh Reviews Arete II, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.
The case for the BQEYZ Winter: Lower mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, keeping voices and guitars natural. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 4.6 dB low with an 8 dB dip near 10.0 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
What the ZiiGaat x Fresh Reviews Arete II does well: Bass through the low mids stays within 1 dB of target and extends flat to 20 Hz, so bass is deep and controlled rather than bloated. The catch: The 3 to 10 kHz range sits about 5 to 6 dB below target with a 9.7 dB dip near 6.5 kHz, so vocals lose clarity, guitars and snares lack bite, and the sound can feel veiled; hobbyist measurements give it a Harman preference score of 65.3.
Buy the BQEYZ Winter. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $40 less than the ZiiGaat x Fresh Reviews Arete II.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Lower mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, keeping voices and guitars natural.
Amazon $239.00 eBay
Bass through the low mids stays within 1 dB of target and extends flat to 20 Hz, so bass is deep and controlled rather than bloated.
Amazon $279.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Winter | ZiiGaat x Fresh Reviews Arete II | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $239.00 | $279.00 |
| Ranked | #910 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #919 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 4 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 12mm dynamic + 1 x 11.6mm bone conduction | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 38 ohms | 24 ohms |
| Frequency Response | 5Hz - 40kHz | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 0 lbs (14.5 g) | - |
| Harman Preference Score | 65 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 65 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.90 dB standard deviation | 2.50 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.11 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.92 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-5.2 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.4 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Sensitivity | - | 104 dB |
| Built-in Microphone | - | No |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ Winter from ankramutt, arn, cammyfi, cqtek, fahryst, hbb, ianfann, musicafe, practiphile, pw, soundcheck39 and timmyv; the ZiiGaat x Fresh Reviews Arete II from aden, atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, bloomaudio, boizoff, dl, hbb, jaytiss, joycesreview, practiphile and pw, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How BQEYZ Winter compares with other leading options: