Short answer: the BQEYZ Winter. It ranks #910 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $239; the Sony INZONE Buds ranks #964, rated 3.1/5, at $238. The price gap is small enough that the sound-quality ranking should decide it.
What the BQEYZ Winter does well: Lower mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, keeping voices and guitars natural. Watch for: Presence sits about 4.6 dB low with an 8 dB dip near 10.0 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
What the Sony INZONE Buds does well: Active noise cancelling, an IPX4 rating and a USB transceiver connection with up to 11 hours of battery (longer over Bluetooth LE Audio) make it a convenient gaming earbud. The catch: Bluetooth is LE Audio only with the LC3 codec, so many older phones and laptops cannot use it without the dongle.
Buy the BQEYZ Winter. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $1 you would save on the Sony INZONE Buds does not close the gap.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Lower mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, keeping voices and guitars natural.
Amazon $239.00 eBay
Active noise cancelling, an IPX4 rating and a USB transceiver connection with up to 11 hours of battery (longer over Bluetooth LE Audio) make it a convenient gaming earbud.
Amazon $238.00 Lowest Sony $239.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Winter | Sony INZONE Buds | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $239.00 | $238.00 |
| Ranked | #910 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #964 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | True wireless |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 12mm dynamic + 1 x 11.6mm bone conduction | 1 x 8.4mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 38 ohms | - |
| Frequency Response | 5Hz - 40kHz | - |
| Weight | 0 lbs (14.5 g) | 0 lbs (6.5 g) per earbud |
| Harman Preference Score | 65 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 63 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.90 dB standard deviation | 2.99 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.11 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.15 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-5.2 dB at 30 Hz) | Falls 6 dB below target at 28 Hz (-6.0 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Active Noise Cancelling | - | Yes |
| Battery Life | - | 11 hours (12 with ANC off via USB transceiver; 18 / 24 via Bluetooth LE Audio, Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Version | - | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth Codecs | - | LC3 (LE Audio only) |
| Built-in Microphone | - | Yes |
| IP Rating | - | IPX4 |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ Winter from ankramutt, arn, cammyfi, cqtek, fahryst, hbb, ianfann, musicafe, practiphile, pw, soundcheck39 and timmyv; the Sony INZONE Buds from gadgetrytech, melatonin and silicagel, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to BQEYZ Winter: