Short answer: the BQEYZ NI. It ranks #614 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.8/5, at $49.99; the Arisyn Huo Shu ranks #668, rated 3.7/5, at $49.99. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.
Why pick the BQEYZ NI: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 71 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: Treble about 3 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Why pick the Arisyn Huo Shu: A budget single dynamic IEM with a 10mm LCP driver and a wood faceplate. The catch: Treble sits about 2.8 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance.
Buy the BQEYZ NI. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Arisyn Huo Shu at the same price, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 71 against the Harman target.
Amazon $49.99 eBay
A budget single dynamic IEM with a 10mm LCP driver and a wood faceplate.
Amazon $49.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ NI | Arisyn Huo Shu | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $49.99 | $49.99 |
| Ranked | #614 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #668 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 71 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 70 (median of 8 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.38 dB standard deviation | 2.54 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.14 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.15 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.8 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.4 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic (LCP) |
| Impedance | - | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | - | 103 dB @ 1 kHz |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ NI from aftersound, bassaudio, digaoreviews, eplv, jaytiss, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk; the Arisyn Huo Shu from aftersound, bassaudio, digaoreviews, fernandagunsan, jaytiss, pw, soundcheck39 and soundignity, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for BQEYZ NI: