Artpical Blue Planet vs QoA Martini

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the QoA Martini. Both are rated 3.5/5 for sound quality (#795 and #839 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the QoA Martini costs $539.10 against $570 for the Artpical Blue Planet, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.

Artpical Blue Planet vs QoA Martini

The case for the Artpical Blue Planet: A 12mm planar IEM with treble right on the Harman target and full sub-bass to 20 Hz, scoring 67 across four measurements. The tradeoff: A 2.45 dB spread from the target shows peaks and dips that better tuned sets avoid.

The case for the QoA Martini: A six driver tribrid with a bone conduction driver, a dynamic driver and four balanced armatures. Watch for: Treble sits about 4.7 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance.

Buy the QoA Martini. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $30.90 less than the Artpical Blue Planet.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Artpical Blue Planet

A 12mm planar IEM with treble right on the Harman target and full sub-bass to 20 Hz, scoring 67 across four measurements.

e-earphone (JP) eBay
$570
QoA Martini

A six driver tribrid with a bone conduction driver, a dynamic driver and four balanced armatures.

Linsoul $539.10 eBay
$539.10

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Artpical Blue Planet QoA Martini
Price$570$539.10
Ranked#839 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#795 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypePlanar MagneticTribrid
Drivers1 x 12mm planar magnetic1 x bone conduction + 1 x dynamic + 4 x balanced armature
Impedance16 ohms-
Sensitivity98 dB/mW @ 1kHz-
Harman Preference Score67 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)68 (median of 5 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.45 dB standard deviation2.32 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.47 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.65 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.3 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Artpical Blue PlanetQoA MartiniHarman target
Frequency response of the Artpical Blue Planet and QoA Martini-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Artpical Blue Planet from aftersound, dchpgall, hu-fi and soundignity; the QoA Martini from bassaudio, hu-fi, joycesreview, pw, soundcheck39 and soundignity, all via squig.link.

More top alternatives to QoA Martini: