64 Audio Tia Trio vs 64 Audio U12t

Last updated: October 11, 2026

Short answer: the 64 Audio Tia Trio. It ranks #373 of 450 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $2,299. The 64 Audio U12t ranks #381, rated 3.2/5, at $1,999, $300 cheaper, not enough of a saving to outweigh the sound-quality gap.

64 Audio Tia Trio vs 64 Audio U12t

The case for the 64 Audio Tia Trio: A single dynamic driver and two balanced armatures give near-neutral sub-bass down to 20 Hz and about 1.8 dB of extra bass for warmth and weight. The tradeoff: In squig.link measurements the 3 to 6 kHz presence band sits about 4.7 dB below target with a 6.6 dB dip near 5.5 kHz, so vocals and strings can sound recessed.

What the 64 Audio U12t does well: Twelve balanced armatures produce a warm, smooth tuning with sub-bass right on target down to 20 Hz and about 1.6 dB of extra bass for body. The catch: Presence sits about 5.7 dB below target from 3 to 6 kHz, with a 7.9 dB dip near 3.3 kHz, so vocals and guitars sound distant and detail is subdued.

Buy the 64 Audio Tia Trio. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $300 you would save on the 64 Audio U12t does not close the gap.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

64 Audio Tia Trio 64 Audio U12t
Price$2,299.00$1,999.00
Ranked#373 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones#381 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score65 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)64 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.59 dB standard deviation2.67 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.86 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeHybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature)Balanced armature
Drivers1 x dynamic + 2 x balanced armature12 x balanced armature
Impedance5.5 ohms12.6 ohms
Sensitivity104 dB/mW108 dB/mW
Frequency Response5Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)10Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Built-in MicrophoneNoNo
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.6 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.4 dB at 30 Hz)

More top alternatives to 64 Audio Tia Trio:

Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Headphones In Full

64 Audio Tia Trio: $2,299.00 64 Audio eBay

64 Audio Tia Trio ranking card

Pros: A single dynamic driver and two balanced armatures give near-neutral sub-bass down to 20 Hz and about 1.8 dB of extra bass for warmth and weight. Air above 10 kHz rises about 4.9 dB, giving cymbals shimmer and a sense of space. At 104 dB/mW it runs fine from a phone. It rates above the 64 Audio U12t and the SoftEars Cerberus.

Cons: In squig.link measurements the 3 to 6 kHz presence band sits about 4.7 dB below target with a 6.6 dB dip near 5.5 kHz, so vocals and strings can sound recessed. A 5.9 dB peak near 11.9 kHz may add a touch of sizzle. The 64 Audio A12t from the same maker earns the same rating for less money.

Released2017 (9 years ago)
BackClosed
Built-in MicrophoneNo
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.59 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeHybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature)
Drivers1 x dynamic + 2 x balanced armature
Form FactorIn-ear
Frequency Response5Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score65 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Impedance5.5 ohms
Sensitivity104 dB/mW
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.6 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt-0.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -5.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-0.1 dB0.70
Peak173 Hz-2.9 dB0.47
Peak5,866 Hz+5.1 dB2.52
Peak1,079 Hz+3.6 dB3.41
Peak3,899 Hz+3.2 dB3.50
High shelf10,000 Hz-10.9 dB0.70
Peak9,335 Hz+5.3 dB1.90
Peak2,172 Hz-1.4 dB3.36
Peak642 Hz-1.1 dB3.27
Peak364 Hz+0.6 dB1.70

64 Audio U12t: $1,999.00 64 Audio eBay

64 Audio U12t ranking card

Pros: Twelve balanced armatures produce a warm, smooth tuning with sub-bass right on target down to 20 Hz and about 1.6 dB of extra bass for body. In the median of 22 hobbyist measurements on squig.link, the treble never rises more than a fraction of a decibel above target between 1.5 and 12 kHz, so there is no harshness or sibilance at any volume. At 108 dB/mW it plays loud from a phone. It matches the rating of the SoftEars Cerberus for less money.

Cons: Presence sits about 5.7 dB below target from 3 to 6 kHz, with a 7.9 dB dip near 3.3 kHz, so vocals and guitars sound distant and detail is subdued. The 64 Audio A12t from the same maker rates higher at the same price, and the Fir Audio e12 matches its rating for less.

BackClosed
Built-in MicrophoneNo
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.67 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeBalanced armature
Drivers12 x balanced armature
Form FactorIn-ear
Frequency Response10Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)
Harman Preference Score64 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Impedance12.6 ohms
Sensitivity108 dB/mW
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.4 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt-0.86 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -5.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-0.4 dB0.70
Peak191 Hz-2.3 dB0.44
Peak8,941 Hz+5.5 dB1.20
Peak3,118 Hz+5.7 dB2.53
Peak2,054 Hz-3.1 dB2.08
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.7 dB0.70
Peak5,678 Hz+3.0 dB5.76
Peak4,885 Hz-1.9 dB6.00
Peak314 Hz+0.4 dB3.39
Peak540 Hz-0.4 dB2.46