TRI Starsea Review: Ranked #812 of 1253

Last updated: October 16, 2026

The TRI Starsea ranks #812 out of 1253 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: TRI

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

TRI Starsea - ranked #812 of 1253 In-Ear Headphones · Editor's rating 3.5/5

#812 TRI Starsea: $129 Discontinued eBay

Pros: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 68 against the Harman target.

Cons: Treble about 5 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones. An uneven response, 2.4 dB standard deviation from target. Discontinued.

Is the TRI Starsea right for you?

Buy it if

  • you are sensitive to bright or sharp treble (treble sits 4.7 dB below target).
  • you want sub-bass rumble that reaches down to 20 Hz.
  • you are happy to use EQ: our preset lifts its Harman match by about 17 points.

Skip it if

  • you want to buy it new: it is discontinued.
BackClosed
ConnectionWired (3.5mm)
Deviation From Target2.41 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeHybrid
Drivers1 Dynamic, 2 Balanced Armature
Form FactorIn-ear
Harman Preference Score68 (median of 9 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.9 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt-0.62 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)

EQ Presets

Harman target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Harman match with this EQ: 85 out of 100, up from 68.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+1.1 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.0 dB0.70
Peak4,146 Hz+6.0 dB1.05

Neutral target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Neutral match with this EQ: 85 out of 100, up from 36.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-7.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.0 dB0.70
Peak4,146 Hz+6.0 dB1.04

Studio flat target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Studio flat match with this EQ: 88 out of 100, up from 17.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-10.0 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+2.0 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz-1.3 dB1.91
Peak191 Hz-3.1 dB0.85
Peak1,645 Hz-3.5 dB2.34
Peak2,773 Hz+6.0 dB1.12
Peak4,652 Hz+3.5 dB2.51
Peak6,005 Hz+1.3 dB6.00

Warm target

Set a preamp of -5.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Warm match with this EQ: 90 out of 100, up from 78.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+1.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-2.4 dB0.70
Peak1,658 Hz-2.7 dB4.54
Peak4,171 Hz+5.9 dB1.55
Peak7,909 Hz-2.2 dB6.00

Bass target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bass match with this EQ: 86 out of 100, up from 68.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+4.9 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.0 dB0.70
Peak4,147 Hz+6.0 dB1.05

Bright target

Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bright match with this EQ: 79 out of 100, up from 23.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-7.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+2.0 dB0.70
Peak198 Hz-1.3 dB0.88
Peak1,641 Hz-3.1 dB3.10
Peak2,607 Hz+1.4 dB4.71
Peak3,573 Hz+6.0 dB1.00
Peak5,509 Hz+3.2 dB4.39

V-shaped target

Set a preamp of -6.6 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 9 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted V-shaped match with this EQ: 76 out of 100, up from 58.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+5.6 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+2.0 dB0.70
Peak1,615 Hz-3.4 dB2.44
Peak3,148 Hz+6.0 dB1.00
Peak5,366 Hz+3.9 dB3.23

Frequency Response

How the TRI Starsea measures across the audible range, against the Harman in-ear target that most listeners prefer in blind tests. Where the line sits above the target that range sounds louder (more bass, brighter treble), below it quieter. The curve is the median of 9 independent measurements, so one odd sample or rig cannot skew it, and both lines are shifted so their 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB.

TRI StarseaHarman target
Measured frequency response of the TRI Starsea-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: median of 9 measurements from the squig.link databases of animagus, dchpgall, hbb, ianfann, iemworld, lown-fi, mmagtech, musicafe and timmyv. Thanks to each of them for publishing their work.

More TRI headphones →