The KZ EDX Pro 2 ranks #561 out of 1084 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.
Brand: KZ
Prices on this page were last checked October 15, 2026 at 5:41 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
#561 KZ EDX Pro 2 The Audio Store eBay
Pros: A very cheap single dynamic IEM, the second generation EDX Pro. Measurements show full sub-bass to 20 Hz (score 70 across three measurements).
Cons: Treble sits about 2.9 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance. It is sold mainly through Indian retailers. Its score rests on three measurements.
Is the KZ EDX Pro 2 right for you?
Buy it if
- your taste runs warm: it scores 81 for that sound.
- you are sensitive to bright or sharp treble (treble sits 2.9 dB below target).
- you want sub-bass rumble that reaches down to 20 Hz.
- you are happy to use EQ: our preset lifts its Harman match by about 20 points.
| Released | 2025 (1 year ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 2.02 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Harman Preference Score | 70 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 24 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB/mW @ 1 kHz |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.84 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
EQ Presets
Harman target
Set a preamp of -4.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Harman match with this EQ: 90 out of 100, up from 70.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | -1.3 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -1.6 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 186 Hz | -2.7 dB | 0.90 |
| Peak | 5,345 Hz | +4.2 dB | 1.10 |
Neutral target
Set a preamp of -4.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Neutral match with this EQ: 91 out of 100, up from 31.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | -9.9 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -1.6 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 186 Hz | -2.6 dB | 0.75 |
| Peak | 5,345 Hz | +4.2 dB | 1.09 |
Studio flat target
Set a preamp of -4.0 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Studio flat match with this EQ: 88 out of 100, up from 12.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | -11.8 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | +2.0 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 170 Hz | -4.5 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 3,441 Hz | +3.9 dB | 1.04 |
| Peak | 5,920 Hz | +2.2 dB | 6.00 |
Warm target
Set a preamp of -2.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Warm match with this EQ: 95 out of 100, up from 81.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | -1.1 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -5.2 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 186 Hz | -2.5 dB | 0.99 |
| Peak | 681 Hz | +1.3 dB | 1.95 |
| Peak | 1,579 Hz | -1.3 dB | 3.68 |
| Peak | 3,317 Hz | +1.0 dB | 5.38 |
| Peak | 5,982 Hz | +3.2 dB | 2.05 |
Bass target
Set a preamp of -4.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bass match with this EQ: 92 out of 100, up from 78.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | +2.4 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -1.6 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 186 Hz | -2.7 dB | 0.98 |
| Peak | 5,345 Hz | +4.2 dB | 1.10 |
Bright target
Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bright match with this EQ: 83 out of 100, up from 19.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | -9.9 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | +1.6 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 186 Hz | -2.6 dB | 0.72 |
| Peak | 4,722 Hz | +6.0 dB | 1.29 |
V-shaped target
Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted V-shaped match with this EQ: 78 out of 100, up from 65.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | +3.1 dB | 0.70 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | +2.0 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 4,527 Hz | +6.0 dB | 1.16 |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
Frequency Response
How the KZ EDX Pro 2 measures across the audible range, against the Harman in-ear target that most listeners prefer in blind tests. Where the line sits above the target that range sounds louder (more bass, brighter treble), below it quieter. The curve is the median of 3 independent measurements, so one odd sample or rig cannot skew it, and both lines are shifted so their 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB.
Measurement data: median of 3 measurements from the squig.link databases of ankramutt, kuping-sensi and theaudiostore. Thanks to each of them for publishing their work.
Head-to-Head Comparisons
2 comparisonsNo comparisons match that search.
