Wharfedale Super Denton vs Micca RB42

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Short answer: the Wharfedale Super Denton for better sound quality, the Micca RB42 for the lower price. The Wharfedale Super Denton ranks #18 of 74 bookshelf speakers at $1499. The Micca RB42 ranks #59 at $159.99, $1339.01 cheaper.

What the Wharfedale Super Denton offers: A 3-way design with a 1” soft dome tweeter, a 2” soft dome midrange offset to the side of a centered 6.5” woven Kevlar woofer - a more compact alternative to Wharfedale’s own Linton 85 with a similar overall character. Measured sensitivity around 86.6-87dB with on-axis linearity within about ±3dB. No cabinet or box resonances turned up in impedance testing, and there are no spike feet to install. Harmonic distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, with about 20dB of usable dynamic range up to 96dB before compression starts to affect the midrange more noticeably near 102dB. Because bass rolls off starting around 60Hz, placing it closer to a wall (about 1-2 feet) than usual boosts low-end punch without the midbass bloat a deeper-extending speaker would get from the same placement. In the reviewer’s own comparison, its estimated in-room response actually measured more linear than the pricier Linton 85’s, despite being a bit less linear on-axis. Watch for: A mid-range scoop from about 200-800Hz and a separate upper-midrange scoop were both audible in direct ABX comparison against a reference-neutral speaker, giving aggressive-sounding material a more subdued character. A resonance around 660-700Hz shows up in measurement, though the reviewer couldn’t reliably hear it with real music in his own blind-ish A/B testing. The offset tweeter-and-midrange layout makes horizontal off-axis response noticeably asymmetric - response drops as much as 8dB more to one side than the other at wider angles - so the reviewer recommends aiming the speakers directly at the listener (not toed out, which loses upper treble) and suggests sidewall absorption to control uneven reflections. Must be listened to with the grille on - measurements are noticeably worse with it off (wider 2-4kHz dip, extra treble bump). Horizontal soundstage width felt a bit narrower than the reviewer personally prefers, likely related to the same offset driver layout. Multitone distortion gets high in the midrange at 96dB/1m, a concern mainly in larger rooms where you’d need to play louder.

What the Micca RB42 offers: Curved cabinet fit and finish look closer to a $400-500 speaker than a $150 one. Rated for a wide 15-100W amplifier range with 4-8 ohm compatibility, giving flexibility with modest amplification. Watch for: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant peaks and valleys in the on-axis and listening-window response starting a few kHz up, with excess high-frequency energy the reviewer found fatiguing over time despite an initial impression of “detail.” Off-axis response diverges heavily from on-axis, meaning tonality shifts with room and listening position in ways EQ can’t correct. Distorts and the woofer visibly flaps under moderate volume; low 83dB sensitivity makes it a harder amplifier load than its size suggests.

Buy the Wharfedale Super Denton if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Micca RB42 if the price matters more than sound quality.

If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the Micca RB42. It ranks near the bottom of the 74 bookshelf speakers, so look higher up the list instead.

Wharfedale Super Denton vs Micca RB42

Specifications Side By Side

Wharfedale Super Denton Micca RB42
Price$1499$159.99
Ranked#18 of 74 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers#59 of 74 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers
Drivers1" soft dome tweeter, 2" soft dome midrange, 6.5" woven Kevlar woofer4" coated paper woofer, 0.75" silk dome tweeter
Sensitivity86.6dB (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)80dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Woofer Cabinetportedported, front
Dimensions14.2"H x 9.7"W x 10.8"D (360 x 246 x 275 mm)8.7H x 4.9W x 7.9D in
Weight20.3 lbs / 9.2 kg (20.2 lbs) each6 lbs / 2.7 kg each (per retailer listing)
Impedance6 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)4-8 ohms
Frequency Response52Hz - 20kHz (±3dB, manufacturer specified); -6dB to 40Hz50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified, typical in-room)
Bass Extension (-3dB)61Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests
Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)62Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests
Crossover Frequency940Hz, 4.6kHz-
Power Handling-15-100W each

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

Prices on this page were last checked August 24, 2026 at 6:53 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Wharfedale Super Denton: $1499 Crutchfield eBay

Wharfedale Super Denton ranking card

Pros: A 3-way design with a 1” soft dome tweeter, a 2” soft dome midrange offset to the side of a centered 6.5” woven Kevlar woofer - a more compact alternative to Wharfedale’s own Linton 85 with a similar overall character. Measured sensitivity around 86.6-87dB with on-axis linearity within about ±3dB. No cabinet or box resonances turned up in impedance testing, and there are no spike feet to install. Harmonic distortion looks good at both 86dB and 96dB, with about 20dB of usable dynamic range up to 96dB before compression starts to affect the midrange more noticeably near 102dB. Because bass rolls off starting around 60Hz, placing it closer to a wall (about 1-2 feet) than usual boosts low-end punch without the midbass bloat a deeper-extending speaker would get from the same placement. In the reviewer’s own comparison, its estimated in-room response actually measured more linear than the pricier Linton 85’s, despite being a bit less linear on-axis.

Cons: A mid-range scoop from about 200-800Hz and a separate upper-midrange scoop were both audible in direct ABX comparison against a reference-neutral speaker, giving aggressive-sounding material a more subdued character. A resonance around 660-700Hz shows up in measurement, though the reviewer couldn’t reliably hear it with real music in his own blind-ish A/B testing. The offset tweeter-and-midrange layout makes horizontal off-axis response noticeably asymmetric - response drops as much as 8dB more to one side than the other at wider angles - so the reviewer recommends aiming the speakers directly at the listener (not toed out, which loses upper treble) and suggests sidewall absorption to control uneven reflections. Must be listened to with the grille on - measurements are noticeably worse with it off (wider 2-4kHz dip, extra treble bump). Horizontal soundstage width felt a bit narrower than the reviewer personally prefers, likely related to the same offset driver layout. Multitone distortion gets high in the midrange at 96dB/1m, a concern mainly in larger rooms where you’d need to play louder.

Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)61Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Crossover Frequency940Hz, 4.6kHz
Dimensions14.2"H x 9.7"W x 10.8"D (360 x 246 x 275 mm)
Drivers1" soft dome tweeter, 2" soft dome midrange, 6.5" woven Kevlar woofer
Frequency Response52Hz - 20kHz (±3dB, manufacturer specified); -6dB to 40Hz
Impedance6 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86.6dB (measured by Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight20.3 lbs / 9.2 kg (20.2 lbs) each
Woofer Cabinetported

Micca RB42: $159.99 Amazon eBay

Micca RB42 ranking card

Pros: Curved cabinet fit and finish look closer to a $400-500 speaker than a $150 one. Rated for a wide 15-100W amplifier range with 4-8 ohm compatibility, giving flexibility with modest amplification.

Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant peaks and valleys in the on-axis and listening-window response starting a few kHz up, with excess high-frequency energy the reviewer found fatiguing over time despite an initial impression of “detail.” Off-axis response diverges heavily from on-axis, meaning tonality shifts with room and listening position in ways EQ can’t correct. Distorts and the woofer visibly flaps under moderate volume; low 83dB sensitivity makes it a harder amplifier load than its size suggests.

Bass Extension (-10dB)62Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests
Bass Extension (-3dB)85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests
Dimensions8.7H x 4.9W x 7.9D in
Drivers4" coated paper woofer, 0.75" silk dome tweeter
Frequency Response50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified, typical in-room)
Impedance4-8 ohms
Power Handling15-100W each
Sensitivity80dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Weight6 lbs / 2.7 kg each (per retailer listing)
Woofer Cabinetported, front