Short answer: the Turtlebox Cub if sound quality matters most, the Zealot S67 if price matters most. The Turtlebox Cub ranks #77 of 102 large speakers, rated 3.0/5, at $330. The Zealot S67 ranks #101, rated 2.0/5, at $70.94, $259.06 cheaper.
The Turtlebox Cub is the better-sounding option. A compact, cube-shaped Turtlebox at 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) with a real two-way layout: a 4.5 inch woofer and a 1.3 inch titanium tweeter. It links with other speakers (Party Mode), which the Zealot S67 cannot. The catch: The evidence so far is listening impressions from two reviews, with no side by side tests against other brands.
The Zealot S67 is the longer-running pick. It offers a lot of practical hardware for a 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) budget speaker: IPX6 water resistance, USB-C charging, aux and microSD playback, speakerphone, a claimed 20-hour battery and TWS pairing for a second unit. It is rated for 20 hours of battery against 14 for the Turtlebox Cub. It plays in stereo from a single unit, unlike the Turtlebox Cub. The catch: Sound quality is the catch.
Buy the Turtlebox Cub when sound quality outweighs the price for you, and the Zealot S67 when the price outweighs sound quality instead.
Want more options? Browse the full Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Turtlebox Cub | Zealot S67 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $330.00 | $70.94 |
| Ranked | #77 of 102 in Large Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #101 of 102 in Large Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| Drivers | 1x 4.5” (114mm) woofer + 1x 1.3” (33mm) titanium tweeter | 60W: Dual drivers + passive radiator |
| Battery Life | 14+ hours (Manufacturer specified) | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IPX6 |
| Weight | 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) | 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) |
| Dimensions | 8.6”H x 7.2”W x 5.7”D (218 x 183 x 146 mm) | 11.6” x 4.8” x 5.2” (294 x 122 x 132 mm) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) | No |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Party Mode | Yes (Party Mode) | No |
| TWS | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo | No | Yes |
| Omnidirectional | No | No |
| Strap | No | - |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Aux Input | - | Yes |
| MicroSD Playback | - | Yes |
| App | - | No |
| Bluetooth Codecs | - | SBC |
| Built-in Microphone | - | Yes |
| EQ | - | No |
| Bluetooth Version | - | 5.2 |
| Amplifier Power | - | 60W |
| Digital Aux Input | - | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Turtlebox Cub compares with other leading options:
- JBL Xtreme 5 vs Turtlebox Cub
- Tribit Stormbox Lava vs Turtlebox Cub
- Soundcore Boom 2 vs Turtlebox Cub
- Marshall Stockwell II vs Turtlebox Cub
- Soundcore Motion Boom vs Turtlebox Cub
Prices on this page were last checked October 4, 2026 at 9:58 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Turtlebox Cub: $330.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: A compact, cube-shaped Turtlebox at 2.4 kg with a real two-way layout: a 4.5 inch woofer and a 1.3 inch titanium tweeter. Reviewers found it very loud for its size, with warm, bass-forward tuning and a bit more bass than the Turtlebox Ranger. IP67 waterproof and dustproof, crush and drop resistant, stainless steel tie-downs, a claimed 14+ hours from a 49.95Wh battery, USB-C charging with a power bank output, stereo pairing and Party Mode.
Cons: The evidence so far is listening impressions from two reviews, with no side by side tests against other brands. One reviewer found it loses bass at high volume, and it is not as loud as the full-size Turtlebox. Turtlebox’s claimed 118dB is a figure the brand’s larger speakers have not come close to at a standard one meter distance. It is also mono from one unit, and its recessed USB-C port only fits slim cable plugs.
Full Turtlebox Cub review and specifications →
| Battery Life | 14+ hours (Manufacturer specified) |
|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Dimensions | 8.6”H x 7.2”W x 5.7”D (218 x 183 x 146 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 4.5” (114mm) woofer + 1x 1.3” (33mm) titanium tweeter |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Party Mode) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Zealot S67: $70.94 AliExpress eBay
Pros: It offers a lot of practical hardware for a 2.4kg budget speaker: IPX6 water resistance, USB-C charging, aux and microSD playback, speakerphone, a claimed 20-hour battery and TWS pairing for a second unit. The large enclosure and dual-driver/passive-radiator layout can provide useful party-level volume.
Cons: Sound quality is the catch. Independent reviewer comparisons report obvious distortion once volume rises past roughly halfway, little true deep bass, and a rolled-off, low-detail treble. There is no app or real EQ to correct that balance, so its long feature list does not make it a good pick for attentive music listening.
Full Zealot S67 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 60W |
|---|---|
| App | No |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Battery Life | 20 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.2 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 11.6” x 4.8” x 5.2” (294 x 122 x 132 mm) |
| Drivers | 60W: Dual drivers + passive radiator |
| EQ | No |
| IP Rating | IPX6 |
| MicroSD Playback | Yes |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | No |
| Power Bank | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | Yes |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Jay’s Straight Up Reviews & More: ZEALOT S-67 🦨 75w Bluetooth Speaker Review🤦🏼♂️ & Comparison With W-King X10. More from JaysStraightUpReviews →
- Jay’s Straight Up Reviews & More: On a Ledge 🪟 Zealot S67 🆚 Soundcore Select Pro - Bluetooth Speaker Comparison
- Jay’s Straight Up Reviews & More: Ortizan M8🦨 Bluetooth Speaker. Is This The Budget JBL Xtreme 3 Killer? Better Than Zealot S67?
- Head-to-Head Comparisons