Short answer: the Tangzu Fudu. It ranks #911 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $89; the Shure SE215 ranks #961, rated 3.1/5, and costs $94, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
What the Tangzu Fudu does well: Bass is lifted about 2.7 dB with extension to 20 Hz, giving kick drums and bass lines extra weight. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 3.7 dB low with a 5.9 dB dip near 5.9 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
The case for the Shure SE215: Bass from 60 to 200 Hz is lifted by about 4.2 dB with low mids up 2.2 dB, giving a warm, full sound that suits rock, pop and hip hop. Watch for: Treble from 6 to 10 kHz is about 3 dB low with a 5.9 dB dip near 6.7 kHz, and the top octave is down 2.7 dB, so cymbals and air sound dull.
Buy the Tangzu Fudu. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Shure SE215 and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
Bass is lifted about 2.7 dB with extension to 20 Hz, giving kick drums and bass lines extra weight.
Amazon $89.00 eBay
Bass from 60 to 200 Hz is lifted by about 4.2 dB with low mids up 2.2 dB, giving a warm, full sound that suits rock, pop and hip hop.
Amazon $94.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Tangzu Fudu | Shure SE215 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $89.00 | $94.00 |
| Ranked | #911 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #961 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature | 1 x dynamic |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | 17 ohms |
| Harman Preference Score | 65 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 63 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.41 dB standard deviation | 2.78 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.88 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.78 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.9 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.0 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Sensitivity | - | 107 dB SPL/mW |
| Frequency Response | - | 22Hz - 17.5kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Tangzu Fudu from bassyalexander, csi-zone, harpo, hbb, ianfann, koi, mmagtech, rg, soundcheck39, soundignity, therollo9 and timmyv; the Shure SE215 from aden, ducbloke, ekaudio, superreview, suporsalad and yoshiultra, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to Tangzu Fudu: