Short answer: the Soundcore Motion X600. It ranks #19 of 102 large speakers by sound quality, rated 4.3/5, at $150; the Turtlebox Cub ranks #77, rated 3.0/5, and costs $330, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
The Soundcore Motion X600 is the better-sounding pick. Firmware 4.2.9 is a big improvement in sound quality over previous releases. It plays in stereo from a single unit, unlike the Turtlebox Cub. Watch for: Stock frequency response is wavy.
What the Turtlebox Cub does well: A compact, cube-shaped Turtlebox at 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) with a real two-way layout: a 4.5 inch woofer and a 1.3 inch titanium tweeter. Watch for: The evidence so far is listening impressions from two reviews, with no side by side tests against other brands.
Buy the Soundcore Motion X600. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Turtlebox Cub and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Still deciding? The full Portable Bluetooth rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Soundcore Motion X600 | Turtlebox Cub | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $150 | $330.00 |
| Ranked | #19 of 102 in Large Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #77 of 102 in Large Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| Aux Input | Yes | - |
| Aux Latency | 0ms | - |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 52Hz | - |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 14+ hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IPX7 | IP67 |
| Bluetooth Latency | 83ms | - |
| Maximum SPL | 104dB (measured by Alan Ross Reviews) | - |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) | Yes (USB-C) |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Stereo | Yes | No |
| Omnidirectional | No | No |
| TWS | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 5.2 lbs (2.35 kg) | 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) |
| App | No | - |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | LDAC, SBC | - |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes | - |
| EQ | No | - |
| Party Mode | Yes (PartyCast up to 100 speakers) | Yes (Party Mode) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | - |
| Dimensions | 11.8” x 4.8” x 3.2” (300 x 121 x 81 mm) | 8.6”H x 7.2”W x 5.7”D (218 x 183 x 146 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x 60mm woofers, 2x 27mm tweeters, 1x 50mm upward-firing driver | 1x 4.5” (114mm) woofer + 1x 1.3” (33mm) titanium tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Amplifier Power | 50W | - |
| Digital Aux Input | No | - |
| Strap | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Soundcore Motion X600:
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Vifa Helsinki
- JBL Xtreme 5 vs Soundcore Motion X600
- Tribit Stormbox Lava vs Soundcore Motion X600
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Brane X
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Minirig 4 with subwoofer
Prices on this page were last checked October 4, 2026 at 9:58 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Soundcore Motion X600: $150 Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay
Smaller models: the Soundcore Motion X500 (ranked lower, rated 4.1/5), the Soundcore Motion 300 (rated 4.5/5) and the Soundcore Motion 100 (rated 3.7/5).
Pros: Firmware 4.2.9 is a big improvement in sound quality over previous releases. Try this Oluv EQ for the best sound quality. Measured bass extension of 52Hz (-10dB).
Cons: Stock frequency response is wavy. Use spatial mode for best sound quality. Need a different EQ for each volume step. Dip in the upper bass around 120Hz. Rising frequency response, treble a little hot. Would be ranked around #20 without the Oluv EQ. Even with the Oluv EQ the bass isn’t very deep and the sound is still a little unnatural.
Full Soundcore Motion X600 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 50W |
|---|---|
| App | No |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Aux Latency | 0ms |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 52Hz |
| Battery Life | 12 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | LDAC, SBC |
| Bluetooth Latency | 83ms |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 11.8” x 4.8” x 3.2” (300 x 121 x 81 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x 60mm woofers, 2x 27mm tweeters, 1x 50mm upward-firing driver |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IPX7 |
| Maximum SPL | 104dB (measured by Alan Ross Reviews) |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (PartyCast up to 100 speakers) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | Yes |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 5.2 lbs (2.35 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Alan Ross Reviews: Soundcore Motion X600 now tuned by Alan Ross (sort of) Not clickbait! More from alanrossreviews →
- Alan Ross Reviews: breaking news…..Soundcore Motion X600 with LDAC and spatial audio!
- Alan Ross Reviews: Spatial Audio: Soundcore Motion X600 Vs Tribit Stormbox Blast
- Alan Ross Reviews: Soundcore Motion x600 (best speaker ever) or two motion booms?
- Alan Ross Reviews: Craziest firmware update ever - Soundcore Motion X600 3.2.8/4.2.8 🤦♀️
- Oluv Patreon: SoundCore Motion X600 vs VIFA Helsinki More from Oluv’Sone →
- NeverEnoughTech: soundcore Motion X600 vs. Sonos Move vs. Bose Soundlink Revolve II
- Jay’s Straight Up Reviews & More: TREBLAB HD-360 (360° Sound) vs Soundcore Motion X600 (Spatial Sound)😮💨 Cornered in Basement Kitchen More from JaysStraightUpReviews →
- Mateusz Cholewa: BOGASING S8 Pro MAX KILLER? vs Soundcore Motion X600 More from Mateusz Cholewa →
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs JBL Xtreme 3
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Loewe We. Hear Pro
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Soundcore Rave Neo 2
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Bose SoundLink Max
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs B&O Beoplay A2 active
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Soundcore Select Pro
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Teufel Rockster Cross
- Soundcore Motion X600 vs Soundcore Motion Boom
- See all 62 comparisons
Turtlebox Cub: $330.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: A compact, cube-shaped Turtlebox at 2.4 kg with a real two-way layout: a 4.5 inch woofer and a 1.3 inch titanium tweeter. Reviewers found it very loud for its size, with warm, bass-forward tuning and a bit more bass than the Turtlebox Ranger. IP67 waterproof and dustproof, crush and drop resistant, stainless steel tie-downs, a claimed 14+ hours from a 49.95Wh battery, USB-C charging with a power bank output, stereo pairing and Party Mode.
Cons: The evidence so far is listening impressions from two reviews, with no side by side tests against other brands. One reviewer found it loses bass at high volume, and it is not as loud as the full-size Turtlebox. Turtlebox’s claimed 118dB is a figure the brand’s larger speakers have not come close to at a standard one meter distance. It is also mono from one unit, and its recessed USB-C port only fits slim cable plugs.
Full Turtlebox Cub review and specifications →
| Battery Life | 14+ hours (Manufacturer specified) |
|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Dimensions | 8.6”H x 7.2”W x 5.7”D (218 x 183 x 146 mm) |
| Drivers | 1x 4.5” (114mm) woofer + 1x 1.3” (33mm) titanium tweeter |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Party Mode) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 5.3 lbs (2.4 kg) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons