Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 vs XTZ Spirit 4

Last updated: September 16, 2026

Short answer: the XTZ Spirit 4. It ranks #92 of 130 bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $477; the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranks #103 and costs $3500, so there is little reason to consider the other one.

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 vs XTZ Spirit 4

What the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 offers: Two-way design with a 1.125” damped Apex Dome silk tweeter and 6.5” cone woofer, using a base of concrete, aluminum, and steel with under-cabinet venting. Notably more neutral than Sonus Faber’s own Lumina 2, which runs 2-5dB hotter in the treble. Horizontal directivity narrows at a fairly constant, well-behaved rate rather than narrowing-then-widening-then-narrowing like some rivals (including the Lumina 2), meaning sidewall reflections match the direct sound well enough that the reviewer doesn’t recommend sidewall absorption for this speaker. The tweeter-to-woofer crossover handoff around 3kHz looks clean, suggesting a higher-order crossover than typical for the size/price class. Good dynamic range - the low end loses only about 2dB from 76dB to 96dB, otherwise holding up well. Not a difficult amplifier load (about 4.2 ohms minimum impedance). Bass extension reaches a genuine 50Hz in-room, fuller than the Lumina 2. Watch for: Sounds notably bright pointed directly on-axis; toeing the speaker out about 30° reduces treble energy and sibilance meaningfully. A resonance around 700Hz gives vocals a slightly nasal, hollow quality. A dip in the upper midrange (roughly 1-2kHz) reduces perceived detail and attack, while the elevated treble can read as “analytical” or “detailed” to some listeners despite being a coloration rather than true resolution. Needs more clearance from the rear wall than some rivals - about 1.5-2 feet in an ideal room, more or less depending on your specific room modes - or the 80-120Hz region can become boomy. Vertical listening window is limited to about ±10-15° from the tweeter axis. Some unexplained directivity irregularities appear around 1.2kHz and 1.6kHz, possibly port-related, along with a longer decay in the 800Hz-1600Hz range in burst-decay measurements. Multitone distortion approaches the reviewer’s 3% threshold through the midrange, though likely not obviously audible without direct A/B comparison. A resonance in the cabinet appears around 400Hz in impedance measurements.

What the XTZ Spirit 4 offers: Substantial 6.5-inch stand-mount with a waveguided dome tweeter, adjustable treble level and port tuning. Spinorama predicts 44Hz in-room extension, broad roughly +/-60-degree horizontal coverage and a 5.39 preference score with a subwoofer. Watch for: The third-party measurement is low confidence. On-axis smoothness is only 0.248, directivity-index consistency is middling at 3.21, and the mildly downward -0.29dB/octave tonal slope contributes to a modest 3.27 raw preference score.

Buy the XTZ Spirit 4. It ranks higher for sound quality than the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.

If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2. It ranks near the bottom of the 130 bookshelf speakers, so look higher up the list instead.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 XTZ Spirit 4
Price$3500 per pair$477 per pair
Ranked#103 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#92 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)-
Bass Extension (-3dB)62Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)-
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)4 ohms
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)86dB
Drivers1x 6.5" mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1" (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter1" dome tweeter, 6.5" woofer
Weight38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)17.9 lbs (8.1 kg) each
Dimensions16.3"H x 8.9"W x 14"D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)13.8H x 7.5W x 10.6D in
Woofer Cabinetported, front-
Spinorama Preference Score3.343.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub5.625.39
Enclosure-2-way passive, rear-ported

More worthwhile head-to-heads for XTZ Spirit 4:

Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2: $3500 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranking card

Pros: Two-way design with a 1.125” damped Apex Dome silk tweeter and 6.5” cone woofer, using a base of concrete, aluminum, and steel with under-cabinet venting. Notably more neutral than Sonus Faber’s own Lumina 2, which runs 2-5dB hotter in the treble. Horizontal directivity narrows at a fairly constant, well-behaved rate rather than narrowing-then-widening-then-narrowing like some rivals (including the Lumina 2), meaning sidewall reflections match the direct sound well enough that the reviewer doesn’t recommend sidewall absorption for this speaker. The tweeter-to-woofer crossover handoff around 3kHz looks clean, suggesting a higher-order crossover than typical for the size/price class. Good dynamic range - the low end loses only about 2dB from 76dB to 96dB, otherwise holding up well. Not a difficult amplifier load (about 4.2 ohms minimum impedance). Bass extension reaches a genuine 50Hz in-room, fuller than the Lumina 2. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.

Cons: Sounds notably bright pointed directly on-axis; toeing the speaker out about 30° reduces treble energy and sibilance meaningfully. A resonance around 700Hz gives vocals a slightly nasal, hollow quality. A dip in the upper midrange (roughly 1-2kHz) reduces perceived detail and attack, while the elevated treble can read as “analytical” or “detailed” to some listeners despite being a coloration rather than true resolution. Needs more clearance from the rear wall than some rivals - about 1.5-2 feet in an ideal room, more or less depending on your specific room modes - or the 80-120Hz region can become boomy. Vertical listening window is limited to about ±10-15° from the tweeter axis. Some unexplained directivity irregularities appear around 1.2kHz and 1.6kHz, possibly port-related, along with a longer decay in the 800Hz-1600Hz range in burst-decay measurements. Multitone distortion approaches the reviewer’s 3% threshold through the midrange, though likely not obviously audible without direct A/B comparison. A resonance in the cabinet appears around 400Hz in impedance measurements.

Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)62Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions16.3"H x 8.9"W x 14"D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Drivers1x 6.5" mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1" (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score3.34
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub5.62
Weight38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, front

XTZ Spirit 4: $477 per pair XTZ eBay

XTZ Spirit 4 ranking card

Pros: Substantial 6.5-inch stand-mount with a waveguided dome tweeter, adjustable treble level and port tuning. Spinorama predicts 44Hz in-room extension, broad roughly +/-60-degree horizontal coverage and a 5.39 preference score with a subwoofer.

Cons: The third-party measurement is low confidence. On-axis smoothness is only 0.248, directivity-index consistency is middling at 3.21, and the mildly downward -0.29dB/octave tonal slope contributes to a modest 3.27 raw preference score.

Dimensions13.8H x 7.5W x 10.6D in
Drivers1" dome tweeter, 6.5" woofer
Enclosure2-way passive, rear-ported
Impedance4 ohms
Sensitivity86dB
Spinorama Preference Score3.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub5.39
Weight17.9 lbs (8.1 kg) each