Short answer: the Shozy B2, though neither ranks well in its class. It ranks #437 of 450 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 1.7/5, at $169.99; the Oriolus Finschi Hifi ranks #442, rated 1.6/5, and costs $199, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh. Both are rated below 3.0/5 among the 450 in-ear headphones; for better sound, the Truthear Nova ranks #2 at $169.99.
Why pick the Shozy B2: The closed in-ear design blocks outside noise and keeps music private. The catch: Crinacle’s measurement gives it a preference score of only 46 with 4.0 dB of deviation from the Harman target, so most listeners will hear it as noticeably colored.
What the Oriolus Finschi Hifi does well: A hybrid design pairs a 10mm dynamic driver with a balanced armature, and the 18 ohm impedance suits phones and dongles. The catch: A preference score of 44 in crinacle’s measurement places it far from the response most listeners prefer, so expect obvious coloration.
Buy the Shozy B2. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Oriolus Finschi Hifi and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Shozy B2 | Oriolus Finschi Hifi | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $169.99 | $199.00 |
| Ranked | #437 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones | #442 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 46 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) | 44 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 4.00 dB standard deviation | 3.95 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.97 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -1.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 18 ohms |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 10Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Sensitivity | - | 112 dB/mW |
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to Shozy B2:
- Westone W10 vs Shozy B2
- 1MORE Quad Driver vs Shozy B2
- Westone W10 vs Oriolus Finschi Hifi
- Oriolus Finschi Hifi vs Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 2
- Oriolus Finschi Hifi vs Westone W20
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Headphones In Full
Shozy B2: $169.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: The closed in-ear design blocks outside noise and keeps music private. Its warm tilt suits listeners who like a darker, less bright sound. It holds a slightly higher rating than the pricier Oriolus Finschi Hifi.
Cons: Crinacle’s measurement gives it a preference score of only 46 with 4.0 dB of deviation from the Harman target, so most listeners will hear it as noticeably colored. The Westone W10 earns a higher rating.
Full Shozy B2 review and specifications →
| Back | Closed |
|---|---|
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 4.00 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 46 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 32 ohms |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.97 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
EQ preset to match the Harman target
Set a preamp of -6.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | +6.2 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 118 Hz | -7.0 dB | 0.21 |
| Peak | 8,958 Hz | +5.8 dB | 1.17 |
| Peak | 3,425 Hz | +5.3 dB | 2.99 |
| Peak | 871 Hz | +4.0 dB | 0.72 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -0.8 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 5,143 Hz | -3.3 dB | 5.99 |
| Peak | 6,277 Hz | +2.9 dB | 5.54 |
| Peak | 4,129 Hz | +1.5 dB | 5.97 |
| Peak | 4,887 Hz | -0.7 dB | 5.89 |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Oriolus Finschi Hifi: $199.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: A hybrid design pairs a 10mm dynamic driver with a balanced armature, and the 18 ohm impedance suits phones and dongles. Its rating matches the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 2.
Cons: A preference score of 44 in crinacle’s measurement places it far from the response most listeners prefer, so expect obvious coloration. The Westone W10 rates a bit higher at about the same price, and the 1MORE Quad Driver rates higher for less.
Full Oriolus Finschi Hifi review and specifications →
| Released | Sep 2019 (7 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 3.95 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 10Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 44 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 18 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 112 dB/mW |
| Tonal Tilt | -1.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
EQ preset to match the Harman target
Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | -4.2 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 181 Hz | -4.4 dB | 0.85 |
| Peak | 3,216 Hz | +6.4 dB | 0.54 |
| Peak | 1,721 Hz | -5.4 dB | 1.04 |
| Peak | 808 Hz | +1.7 dB | 1.99 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | +6.4 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 6,153 Hz | -4.9 dB | 4.24 |
| Peak | 5,239 Hz | +2.0 dB | 6.00 |
| Peak | 66 Hz | +0.4 dB | 2.03 |
| Peak | 3,460 Hz | +0.8 dB | 3.69 |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons