Short answer: the Shanling Regal. It ranks #331 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.1/5, at $799; the DITA Mecha ranks #382, rated 4.0/5, and costs $899, so there is little reason to consider the other one.
What the Shanling Regal does well: The median of 3 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 75 with a 1.81 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.9 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The catch: A 5.2 dB peak near 11.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Why pick the DITA Mecha: Hobbyist measurements on squig.link put its preference score at 73.6 with a smooth 1.75 dB deviation, so no single band pulls far from a natural balance. Watch for: A 4.7 dB dip near 6.3 kHz sits right beside a 5.2 dB peak near 8 kHz, so cymbals and sibilants can sound slightly uneven, recessed one moment and sharp the next.
Buy the Shanling Regal. It is rated higher for sound quality than the DITA Mecha and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
The median of 3 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 75 with a 1.81 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.9 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $799.00 eBay
Hobbyist measurements on squig.link put its preference score at 73.6 with a smooth 1.75 dB deviation, so no single band pulls far from a natural balance.
Bloom Audio $899.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Shanling Regal | DITA Mecha | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $799.00 | $899.00 |
| Ranked | #331 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #382 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 75 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 74 (median of 8 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.81 dB standard deviation | 1.75 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.44 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.53 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.6 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.0 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (2 dynamic + 4 balanced armature + 2 planar magnetic) | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 2 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature + 2 x planar magnetic | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 108 dB | 113 dB SPL/V |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | No |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Shanling Regal from aden, atechreviews and joycesreview; the DITA Mecha from atechreviews, bloomaudio, eliseaudio, jaytiss, obodio, superreview, tonedeafmonk and zerostresslevel, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to Shanling Regal: