Short answer: the Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 if sound quality matters most, the Polk Audio Reserve R700 if price matters most. The Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 ranks #5 of 71 floorstanding speakers at $7998. The Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranks #32 at $1199, $6799 cheaper.
What the Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 offers: ASR’s revised Spinorama measurement shows bass reaching 32.2Hz at -3dB and 27.8Hz at -6dB, giving substantial low-end weight without a subwoofer. The response spans 2.3dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with preference scores of 5.10 standalone and 6.12 with an ideal subwoofer. The review’s exceptionally low bass distortion at ordinary levels complements that extension, while dual 6.5-inch Purifi woofers provide a strong foundation for full-range listening. Watch for: Vertical directivity is narrow and horizontal coverage is uneven, so listening height and placement affect tonal balance. Treble resonances and response irregularities keep it from reference-level neutrality. Spinorama’s modeled EQ improves the scores to 6.09 standalone and 6.99 with an ideal subwoofer, but those are corrected results, not stock performance. Measured sensitivity is 85.9dB at 2.83V/1m with a nominal 4-ohm load; use an amplifier comfortable driving 4 ohms. Distortion rises at very high playback levels.
What the Polk Audio Reserve R700 offers: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. On-axis frequency response holds within about ±2dB across most of its range, with genuinely deep bass extension (F3 40Hz) reaching into the mid-30s Hz in-room. Wide horizontal radiation of about ±70°, giving a strong, enveloping stereo width and stage-extension effect on well-recorded tracks. Good low-level dynamics - solid bass thump at quiet listening volumes without over-accentuation. Strong distortion and compression control through the bass and midrange. Real nominal impedance closer to 4 ohms than the marketed 8 ohms, so with the right amplifier it can be driven hard - a $3,000 two-channel integrated brought out significantly more life than a budget $300 unit could. Excellent value at its roughly $2,200/pair MSRP, ranking among the reviewer’s top picks under $2,500; outperforms the similarly-priced Klipsch RP-8000F II in bass extension and overall smoothness. Watch for: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers. Horizontal directivity mismatch around 4-5kHz, where the tweeter flares wider than the midrange, can sound a bit forward - especially noticeable when toed out further into the room; sidewall absorption or curtains help tame it. Harmonic distortion crosses the reviewer’s 3% threshold around 7kHz at 96dB output, possibly contributing to that same forward quality at high volume. Narrow vertical sweet spot (about ±15° from the tweeter axis), typical of non-coaxial tower designs - more of a consideration for multi-row home theater seating than single-row listening. The ring-radiator tweeter narrows noticeably above about 7-8kHz, and toeing the speaker out more than about 20° causes the top end to fall off quickly. Needs at least 2 feet of clearance from the rear wall to avoid boomy, exaggerated bass, since it lacks the bass-shelf tuning some rivals use to allow closer wall placement. Compared to the pricier KEF R5 Meta, has narrower horizontal (and much narrower vertical) directivity, so seating flexibility is more limited.
Buy the Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Polk Audio Reserve R700 if the price matters more than sound quality.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 | Polk Audio Reserve R700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7,998 per pair | $1,199.00 per pair |
| Ranked | #5 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #32 of 71 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 32.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 24.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85.9dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review; 86dB manufacturer specified) | 87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | Custom waveguide-loaded tweeter with beam-expansion fins, 2x 6.5" Purifi USHINDI aluminum-cone woofers | 2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter |
| Dimensions | 40.4"H x 8.7"W x 14"D (1025 x 222 x 355 mm) | 45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm) |
| Weight | 101.4 lbs (46 kg) each | 102.1 lbs (46.3 kg) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal | 4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 2.4kHz | - |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, large rear port | ported, down-firing |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.10 | 5.57 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.12 | 7.02 |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 compares with other leading options:
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F328Be
Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66: $7,998 per pair Radiant Acoustics eBay
Pros: ASR’s revised Spinorama measurement shows bass reaching 32.2Hz at -3dB and 27.8Hz at -6dB, giving substantial low-end weight without a subwoofer. The response spans 2.3dB from 300Hz to 5kHz, with preference scores of 5.10 standalone and 6.12 with an ideal subwoofer. The review’s exceptionally low bass distortion at ordinary levels complements that extension, while dual 6.5-inch Purifi woofers provide a strong foundation for full-range listening. Measured bass extension of 32.2Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.9dB.
Cons: Vertical directivity is narrow and horizontal coverage is uneven, so listening height and placement affect tonal balance. Treble resonances and response irregularities keep it from reference-level neutrality. Spinorama’s modeled EQ improves the scores to 6.09 standalone and 6.99 with an ideal subwoofer, but those are corrected results, not stock performance. Measured sensitivity is 85.9dB at 2.83V/1m with a nominal 4-ohm load; use an amplifier comfortable driving 4 ohms. Distortion rises at very high playback levels.
Full Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 24.4Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 32.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Crossover Frequency | 2.4kHz |
| Dimensions | 40.4"H x 8.7"W x 14"D (1025 x 222 x 355 mm) |
| Drivers | Custom waveguide-loaded tweeter with beam-expansion fins, 2x 6.5" Purifi USHINDI aluminum-cone woofers |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 85.9dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review; 86dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.10 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.12 |
| Weight | 101.4 lbs (46 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, large rear port |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F328Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F226Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs JBL 4367
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs Revel F228Be
- See all 23 comparisons
Polk Audio Reserve R700: $1,199.00 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. On-axis frequency response holds within about ±2dB across most of its range, with genuinely deep bass extension (F3 40Hz) reaching into the mid-30s Hz in-room. Wide horizontal radiation of about ±70°, giving a strong, enveloping stereo width and stage-extension effect on well-recorded tracks. Good low-level dynamics - solid bass thump at quiet listening volumes without over-accentuation. Strong distortion and compression control through the bass and midrange. Real nominal impedance closer to 4 ohms than the marketed 8 ohms, so with the right amplifier it can be driven hard - a $3,000 two-channel integrated brought out significantly more life than a budget $300 unit could. Excellent value at its roughly $2,200/pair MSRP, ranking among the reviewer’s top picks under $2,500; outperforms the similarly-priced Klipsch RP-8000F II in bass extension and overall smoothness. Measured bass extension of 40Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87.5dB.
Cons: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers. Horizontal directivity mismatch around 4-5kHz, where the tweeter flares wider than the midrange, can sound a bit forward - especially noticeable when toed out further into the room; sidewall absorption or curtains help tame it. Harmonic distortion crosses the reviewer’s 3% threshold around 7kHz at 96dB output, possibly contributing to that same forward quality at high volume. Narrow vertical sweet spot (about ±15° from the tweeter axis), typical of non-coaxial tower designs - more of a consideration for multi-row home theater seating than single-row listening. The ring-radiator tweeter narrows noticeably above about 7-8kHz, and toeing the speaker out more than about 20° causes the top end to fall off quickly. Needs at least 2 feet of clearance from the rear wall to avoid boomy, exaggerated bass, since it lacks the bass-shelf tuning some rivals use to allow closer wall placement. Compared to the pricier KEF R5 Meta, has narrower horizontal (and much narrower vertical) directivity, so seating flexibility is more limited.
Full Polk Audio Reserve R700 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.57 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.02 |
| Weight | 102.1 lbs (46.3 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, down-firing |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs Q Acoustics 5040
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs Emotiva Airmotiv T2+
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs PSB Imagine T65
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DF63
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs Polk Reserve R500
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs JBL HDI-3600
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs KEF R11 Meta
- Polk Audio Reserve R700 vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- See all 43 comparisons