Polk R200 vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2

Last updated: October 1, 2026

Short answer: the Polk R200 for value; the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 only if you can toe it out. The Sonetto II G2’s 1.125” Apex Dome silk tweeter sounds notably bright on-axis, and toeing it out about 30 degrees meaningfully reduces treble energy and sibilance. The R200 at $799 is the affordable pick, with reasonably tight imaging offset by a resonance and distortion rise around 800Hz-1kHz.

Polk R200 vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2

Buy the Polk R200. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Polk R200 Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2
Price$799.00 per pair$3500 per pair
Ranked#102 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#106 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)62Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3.8 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85dB87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers25mm soft dome + 165mm woofer1x 6.5” mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1” (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Weight31.3 lbs (14.2 kg)38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Dimensions14.1”H x 7.5”W x 13.9”D (359.0 x 190.0 x 353.8 mm)16.3”H x 8.9”W x 14”D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, front
Spinorama Preference Score5.094.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.616.54
DIY KitNoNo

More worthwhile head-to-heads for Polk R200:

Prices on this page were last checked October 2, 2026 at 10:18 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Polk R200: $799.00 per pair Amazon eBay

Polk R200 ranking card

Pros: Two-way design with a 6.5” midwoofer and 1” ring radiator tweeter, giving reasonably tight, well-defined imaging. Neutral through most of the midrange (roughly 200Hz-1kHz). On-axis response holds within about 1.5dB up to 10kHz. About 20dB of usable dynamic range (76dB to 96dB) before more significant compression sets in. Reasonably close to a 4-ohm nominal load, giving some flexibility with amplifier choice, though a dedicated 4-ohm-capable amp is still recommended. Measured bass extension of 74Hz (-3dB).

Cons: A resonance and associated distortion increase around 800Hz-1kHz creates a “tinny,” occasionally glaring quality on certain instruments and vocals, confirmed both by ear and in the frequency-response and distortion measurements. Above about 10kHz, the ring-radiator tweeter takes on an artificial, “digital-esque” quality, then falls off quickly above 16kHz. F3 of 74Hz and F10 of 50Hz mean there’s essentially no meaningful bass “thump” below about 60Hz: a subwoofer is strongly recommended even just to restore basic kick-drum presence. The ring radiator tweeter’s dispersion narrows sharply above about 8kHz, so the speaker should be aimed close to on-axis (no more than 5-10° of toe-out). Vertical listening position is fairly critical: moving more than a few degrees above or below the tweeter line causes a noticeable timbre shift due to a gap in the crossover region. Multitone distortion spikes substantially (to around 10%) in the 600Hz-1kHz region at higher output levels (around 96dB/1m), meaning the glare gets worse the louder it’s played. At the highest tested output (102dB, 26dB of dynamic range), the woofer shows clear signs of struggling; crossing to a subwoofer around 80-100Hz helps prevent bottoming out but doesn’t fully eliminate the compression.

Bass Extension (-10dB)50Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions14.1”H x 7.5”W x 13.9”D (359.0 x 190.0 x 353.8 mm)
Drivers25mm soft dome + 165mm woofer
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3.8 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85dB
Spinorama Preference Score5.09
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.61
Weight31.3 lbs (14.2 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2: $3500 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranking card

Pros: Two-way design with a 1.125” damped Apex Dome silk tweeter and 6.5” cone woofer, using a base of concrete, aluminum, and steel with under-cabinet venting. Notably more neutral than Sonus Faber’s own Lumina 2, which runs 2-5dB hotter in the treble. Horizontal directivity narrows at a fairly constant, well-behaved rate rather than narrowing-then-widening-then-narrowing like some rivals (including the Lumina 2), meaning sidewall reflections match the direct sound well enough that the reviewer doesn’t recommend sidewall absorption for this speaker. The tweeter-to-woofer crossover handoff around 3kHz looks clean, suggesting a higher-order crossover than typical for the size/price class. Good dynamic range: the low end loses only about 2dB from 76dB to 96dB, otherwise holding up well. Not a difficult amplifier load (about 4.2 ohms minimum impedance). Bass extension reaches a genuine 50Hz in-room, fuller than the Lumina 2. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.

Cons: Sounds notably bright pointed directly on-axis; toeing the speaker out about 30° reduces treble energy and sibilance meaningfully. A resonance around 700Hz gives vocals a slightly nasal, hollow quality. A dip in the upper midrange (roughly 1-2kHz) reduces perceived detail and attack, while the elevated treble can read as “analytical” or “detailed” to some listeners despite being a coloration rather than true resolution. Needs more clearance from the rear wall than some rivals (about 1.5-2 feet in an ideal room, more or less depending on your specific room modes) or the 80-120Hz region can become boomy. Vertical listening window is limited to about ±10-15° from the tweeter axis. Some unexplained directivity irregularities appear around 1.2kHz and 1.6kHz, possibly port-related, along with a longer decay in the 800Hz-1600Hz range in burst-decay measurements. Multitone distortion approaches the reviewer’s 3% threshold through the midrange, though likely not obviously audible without direct A/B comparison. A resonance in the cabinet appears around 400Hz in impedance measurements.

Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)62Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions16.3”H x 8.9”W x 14”D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Drivers1x 6.5” mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1” (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score4.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.54
Weight38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, front