Short answer: the Oriveti OD200. It ranks #936 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $199; the DUNU x KOTO ITO ranks #957, rated 3.2/5, and costs $199.99, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.
Why pick the Oriveti OD200: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. Watch for: Treble about 2 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
The case for the DUNU x KOTO ITO: Bass is boosted about 4 dB across both sub-bass and mid-bass, and it holds that level all the way down to 20 Hz, so electronic and hip-hop tracks get real weight and rumble. The tradeoff: A Harman preference score of 64.4 in hobbyist measurements reflects a tilted, bass-heavy tuning that will feel thick to listeners who want neutral sound.
Buy the Oriveti OD200. It is rated higher for sound quality than the DUNU x KOTO ITO and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.
Amazon $199 eBay
Bass is boosted about 4 dB across both sub-bass and mid-bass, and it holds that level all the way down to 20 Hz, so electronic and hip-hop tracks get real weight and rumble.
Amazon $199.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Oriveti OD200 | DUNU x KOTO ITO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199 | $199.99 |
| Ranked | #936 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #957 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 65 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 64 (median of 8 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 3.06 dB standard deviation | 2.37 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.07 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -1.12 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-5.1 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+4.0 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid (2 dynamic + 2 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 9.8mm beryllium-coated dynamic driver | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 8mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | 37 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 108 ±3 dB/mW | 105 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz | 5Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | Not specified | 0 lbs (6.5 g) per side |
| Built-in Microphone | - | No |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Oriveti OD200 from animagus, dl, jaytiss and tonedeafmonk; the DUNU x KOTO ITO from atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, elrics, hobbytalk, jaytiss, soundignity and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to Oriveti OD200: