Neumann KH 310 A vs JBL 708P

Short answer: the JBL 708P for on- and off-axis response, the Neumann KH 310 A for a cleaner on-axis picture. The 708P’s CEA2034 spinorama shows extremely good frequency response on and off axis with excellent horizontal directivity, though a port resonance adds a mild rise around 600-900Hz. The KH 310 A shows a near-perfect on-axis response with superb directivity control, but a dip around 80Hz is unexplained.

Buy the Neumann KH 310 A. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $998 saving on the JBL 708P is not enough to make up the difference.

Want more options? Browse the full Powered Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Related Speaker Comparisons

More top alternatives to Neumann KH 310 A:

• AsciLab C8C vs Neumann KH 310 A
• Neumann KH 310 A vs Mesanovic CDM65
• Genelec 8351B vs Neumann KH 310 A
• Neumann KH420 vs Neumann KH 310 A
• Genelec 8361A vs Neumann KH 310 A

Prices on this page were last checked October 2, 2026 at 10:18 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Neumann KH 310 A: $4,998 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: The sealed three-way design combines 35.2Hz measured -3dB extension with low distortion in the review’s demanding playback tests. Its 2.2dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and 7.70 ideal-subwoofer score support balanced monitoring with useful full-range capability. Measured bass extension of 35.2Hz (-3dB).

Cons: Its measured tonal balance is not as even as the KH 150 or the best coaxial alternatives. Correct orientation and listening height matter for the separated drivers. The analog system lacks the integrated calibration workflow of newer DSP models, so room correction requires additional equipment. An unexplained dip around 80Hz shows in the measurements.

Full Neumann KH 310 A review and specifications →

AES Input	No
Amplifier Power	290W total (150W woofer, 70W mid, 70W tweeter)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	28.3Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	35.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	No
Dimensions	10” x 15.1” x 11.5” (253 x 383 x 292 mm) (H x W x D)
Drivers	8.25” woofer, 3” midrange, 1” tweeter
EQ	No
Frequency Response	34Hz - 21kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR (balanced analog)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	6.21
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	7.70
TRS Input	No
USB Input	No
Weight	28.7 lbs (13.0 kg)
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official Neumann KH 310 A Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs HEDD Type 20 MK2
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs Genelec S360
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs LOGProfessional Alpha
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs Adam Audio S2V
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs JBL 308P MKII
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs Buchardt A10
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs Yamaha HS8
  • Neumann KH 310 A vs Kali Audio LP-6 V2
  • See all 37 comparisons

JBL 708P: $4000 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay

Pros: Erin’s measurements give 43.9Hz -3dB extension and a 6.91 ideal-subwoofer score, with useful bass from a professional active monitor. The waveguide and onboard processing make it a practical choice for a carefully installed studio system. Measured bass extension of 43.9Hz (-3dB).

Cons: The 2.6dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz includes audible-relevance irregularities, with port-region features and vertical crossover sensitivity. High-level distortion remains a constraint. Its professional positioning and amplifier power do not make it automatically more neutral than the cheaper 308P MKII. A port resonance adds a mild rise around 600 to 900Hz, and vertical dispersion is narrower than horizontal, so stay within a few degrees of the tweeter axis.

Full JBL 708P review and specifications →

AES Input	Yes
Amplifier Power	500W total (250W woofer, 250W tweeter)
App	No
Aux Input	No
Bass Extension (-10dB)	35.6Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)	43.9Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bluetooth	No
Coaxial Input	No
DSP	No
Dimensions	17.2”H x 9.8”W x 11.5”D (438 x 248 x 292 mm)
Drivers	8” woofer, 2409H 1” compression driver
EQ	No
Frequency Response	41Hz - 25kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
HDMI Input	No
Inputs	XLR/TRS combo (analog), XLR AES3 (digital)
Optical Input	No
RCA Input	No
Spinorama Preference Score	5.03
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub	6.91
TRS Input	Yes
USB Input	No
Weight	25.1 lbs (11.4 kg) each
XLR Input	Yes

• Links
  • Official JBL 708P Product Page
• Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
  • Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org) More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
  • Erin’s Audio Corner: JBL 708P Master Reference Monitor Review
• Head-to-Head Comparisons
  • JBL 708P vs Klipsch The Nines
  • JBL 708P vs Meyer Sound Amie
  • JBL 708P vs JBL 306P MKII
  • JBL 708P vs JBL M2 Master Reference Monitor
  • JBL 708P vs Fluid Audio Image 2
  • JBL 708P vs Barefoot Footprint 01
  • JBL 708P vs JBL 4329P
  • JBL 708P vs Genelec 8040B
  • See all 34 comparisons