Short answer: the Neumann KH 310 A. It ranks #20 of 113 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality (rated 4.6/5) at $4,998 and is still sold new; the Focal Twin6 Be ranks #101 (rated 3.8/5) and is discontinued, so it is only an option used. The Focal Twin6 Be’s replacement, the Focal ST6 Twin6, is rated 3.8/5.
The Neumann KH 310 A is the more accurate, deeper-bass option. The sealed three-way design combines 35.2Hz measured -3dB extension with low distortion in the review’s demanding playback tests. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 6.21 against 4.04 for the Focal Twin6 Be. Its bass reaches about 35.2Hz before falling 3dB, against 48.3Hz for the Focal Twin6 Be. Watch for: Its measured tonal balance is not as even as the KH 150 or the best coaxial alternatives.
The case for the Focal Twin6 Be: The dual-woofer arrangement offers useful output capability for studio work, with a 48.3Hz measured -3dB point in the horizontal test. The catch: The horizontal measurement scores 6.06 with an ideal subwoofer and spans 2.9dB from 300Hz to 5kHz.
Buy the Neumann KH 310 A. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the Focal Twin6 Be is discontinued, so it is only available used.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Powered Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Neumann KH 310 A | Focal Twin6 Be | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,998 per pair | Discontinued |
| Ranked | #20 of 113 in Large Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #101 of 113 in Large Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 35.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 48.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 28.3Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) | 39.1Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Frequency Response | 34Hz - 21kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) | 40Hz - 40kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Drivers | 8.25” woofer, 3” midrange, 1” tweeter | 1” inverted beryllium tweeter; dual 6.5” W-cone drivers |
| App | No | - |
| EQ | No | - |
| DSP | No | - |
| Amplifier Power | 290W total (150W woofer, 70W mid, 70W tweeter) | 150W LF + 100W LF/MF + 100W HF |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.21 | 4.04 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.70 | 6.06 |
| Inputs | XLR (balanced analog) | Balanced XLR with +4dBu/-10dBV sensitivity |
| XLR Input | Yes | Yes |
| RCA Input | No | No |
| TRS Input | No | No |
| Optical Input | No | No |
| Coaxial Input | No | No |
| USB Input | No | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | No |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Dimensions | 10” x 15.1” x 11.5” (253 x 383 x 292 mm) (H x W x D) | 9.8” x 19.7” x 13.4” (250 x 500 x 340 mm) (H x W x D) |
| Weight | 28.7 lbs (13.0 kg) | 48.5 lbs (22 kg) |
| Bass Extension | - | 40Hz manufacturer specified; Erin measured strong low-frequency linearity |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Neumann KH 310 A:
- AsciLab C8C vs Neumann KH 310 A
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Mesanovic CDM65
- Genelec 8351B vs Neumann KH 310 A
- Neumann KH420 vs Neumann KH 310 A
- Genelec 8361A vs Neumann KH 310 A
Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Neumann KH 310 A: $4,998 per pair B&H Photo Video eBay
Same family: the Neumann KH80 DSP (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the Neumann KH120 MKII (smaller bookshelf, rated 4.7/5), the Neumann KH 150 (smaller bookshelf, ranked higher, rated 4.8/5), the Neumann KH420 (larger bookshelf, ranked higher, rated 4.8/5) and the Neumann KH 750 DSP (subwoofer, rated 3.5/5).
Pros: The sealed three-way design combines 35.2Hz measured -3dB extension with low distortion in the review’s demanding playback tests. Its 2.2dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz and 7.70 ideal-subwoofer score support balanced monitoring with useful full-range capability. Measured bass extension of 35.2Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Its measured tonal balance is not as even as the KH 150 or the best coaxial alternatives. Correct orientation and listening height matter for the separated drivers. The analog system lacks the integrated calibration workflow of newer DSP models, so room correction requires additional equipment. An unexplained dip around 80Hz shows in the measurements.
Full Neumann KH 310 A review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 290W total (150W woofer, 70W mid, 70W tweeter) |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 28.3Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 35.2Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| DSP | No |
| Dimensions | 10” x 15.1” x 11.5” (253 x 383 x 292 mm) (H x W x D) |
| Drivers | 8.25” woofer, 3” midrange, 1” tweeter |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 34Hz - 21kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR (balanced analog) |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.21 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.70 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 28.7 lbs (13.0 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Neumann KH 310 A vs LOGProfessional Alpha
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Adam Audio S2V
- Neumann KH 310 A vs HEDD Type 20 MK2
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Genelec S360
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Buchardt A10
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Neumann KH 150
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Genelec 8341A
- Neumann KH 310 A vs Genelec 8361A
- See all 35 comparisons
Focal Twin6 Be Discontinued eBay
Newer model: the Focal ST6 Twin6, ranked lower, estimated 3.8/5.
Pros: The dual-woofer arrangement offers useful output capability for studio work, with a 48.3Hz measured -3dB point in the horizontal test. Its professional controls and format can suit a dedicated monitoring installation. Measured bass extension of 48.3Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The horizontal measurement scores 6.06 with an ideal subwoofer and spans 2.9dB from 300Hz to 5kHz. Off-axis variation limits tonal consistency across listening positions. Orientation matters, and neither the beryllium tweeter nor the additional woofer makes its measured balance class-leading. Erin suspected intermodulation-related roughness even though harmonic distortion measured low. Discontinued.
Full Focal Twin6 Be review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 150W LF + 100W LF/MF + 100W HF |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension | 40Hz manufacturer specified; Erin measured strong low-frequency linearity |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39.1Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 48.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9.8” x 19.7” x 13.4” (250 x 500 x 340 mm) (H x W x D) |
| Drivers | 1” inverted beryllium tweeter; dual 6.5” W-cone drivers |
| Frequency Response | 40Hz - 40kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Balanced XLR with +4dBu/-10dBV sensitivity |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.04 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.06 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 48.5 lbs (22 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Edifier R2850DB
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Ex Machina Pulsar MKII
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Klipsch The Sevens
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Kali Audio LP-8
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Adam Audio T7V
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Adam Audio T8V
- Focal Twin6 Be vs PMC result6
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Ocean Way Audio HR5
- See all 35 comparisons