Short answer: the KZ EDX Pro, though neither ranks well in its class. It ranks #1057 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 2.7/5, at $17.99; the Apple EarPods ranks #1135, rated 2.2/5, and costs $19, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff. Both are rated below 3.0/5 among the 1291 in-ear headphones, and the EPZ G10, ranked #16 at $23.74, is a better place to start if sound quality matters.
The KZ EDX Pro is the better-sounding pick. It costs very little and is easy to drive, with 24 ohm impedance and a 112 dB sensitivity rating that suit a phone. The tradeoff: Crinacle’s measurement gives it a preference score of 58, well short of what most listeners prefer.
Why pick the Apple EarPods: A simple wired earphone with a built-in microphone, so there is no battery to charge and no pairing to manage. Watch for: Sub-bass falls away below 40 Hz, landing about 8 dB under target at 30 Hz, so the deepest synth and kick drum notes lose their rumble.
Buy the KZ EDX Pro. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Apple EarPods and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
It costs very little and is easy to drive, with 24 ohm impedance and a 112 dB sensitivity rating that suit a phone.
Amazon $17.99 eBay
A simple wired earphone with a built-in microphone, so there is no battery to charge and no pairing to manage.
Amazon $19.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| KZ EDX Pro | Apple EarPods | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $17.99 | $19.00 |
| Ranked | #1057 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #1135 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Harman Preference Score | 58 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) | 51 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.91 dB standard deviation | 4.17 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -1.10 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.22 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | - |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | - |
| Impedance | 24 ohms | - |
| Sensitivity | 112 dB | - |
| Frequency Response | 10Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.7 dB at 30 Hz) | Falls 6 dB below target at 40 Hz (-8.4 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Built-in Microphone | - | Yes |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the KZ EDX Pro from achoreviews, aden, aftersound, ankramutt, bassyalexander, eplv, hbb, jacstone, lown-fi, melatonin, obodio, precog, pw, rg, superreview and vortexreviews; the Apple EarPods from dchpgall, lown-fi and yoshiultra, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to KZ EDX Pro: