Short answer: the Klipsch Nashville. It ranks #70 of 144 medium speakers by sound quality (rated 3.3/5); the DBSONO X-Blast F37 ranks #96 (rated 2.8/5).
What the Klipsch Nashville does well: Sturdy rubber-coated build. ~24 hour battery life with fast 18W USB-C charging; can reverse-charge your phone. Watch for: Upper bass boost.
Why pick the DBSONO X-Blast F37: 25W woofer + 10W tweeter + rear passive radiator. The tradeoff: Very recessed lower mids, peaky upper mids, just not a great frequency response overall.
Buy the Klipsch Nashville. It is rated higher for sound quality than the DBSONO X-Blast F37.
Want more options? Browse the full Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Klipsch Nashville | DBSONO X-Blast F37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $94.99 | - |
| Ranked | #70 of 144 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #96 of 144 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | Yes | - |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | ~64Hz | 49Hz |
| Battery Life | 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 8 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes | - |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IPX5 |
| Party Mode | Yes (Broadcast Mode) | - |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C, 10W) | - |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| TWS | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 2.1 lbs (970 g) | 1.7 lbs (771 g) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| Drivers | 2x 57mm fullrange | 25W woofer, 10W tweeter, passive radiator |
| Dimensions | 7” x 3.1” x 3.2” (178 x 78 x 81 mm) | 8” x 2.5” x 3.6” (202 x 64 x 90.9 mm) |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 100Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Amplifier Power | 20W RMS | 35W |
| Maximum SPL | 89dB (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Digital Aux Input | No | No |
| Omnidirectional | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| EQ | Yes | Yes (Bass Boost) |
| Stereo | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Klipsch Nashville:
- Earfun Uboom L vs Klipsch Nashville
- Klipsch Nashville vs Soundcore Motion 300
- Soundcore Motion+ vs Klipsch Nashville
- Soundcore Boost “upgraded” 2021 vs Klipsch Nashville
- Minirig 4 vs Klipsch Nashville
Prices on this page were last checked September 26, 2026 at 11:14 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Klipsch Nashville: $94.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: Sturdy rubber-coated build. ~24 hour battery life with fast 18W USB-C charging; can reverse-charge your phone. IP67 rated. Measured bass extension of ~64Hz (-10dB).
Cons: Upper bass boost. Bass not as deep as the top ranked speakers. Boosted lower treble, sounds a little harsh like most Klipsch speakers.
Full Klipsch Nashville review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 20W RMS |
|---|---|
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | ~64Hz |
| Battery Life | 24 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 7” x 3.1” x 3.2” (178 x 78 x 81 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x 57mm fullrange |
| EQ | Yes |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Maximum SPL | 89dB (Manufacturer specified) |
| Omnidirectional | Yes |
| Party Mode | Yes (Broadcast Mode) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C, 10W) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 2.1 lbs (970 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch Nashville vs Sony XB23
- Klipsch Nashville vs JBL Flip Essential
- Klipsch Nashville vs JBL Charge 3
- Klipsch Nashville vs JBL Flip 4
- Klipsch Nashville vs JBL Charge Essential
- Klipsch Nashville vs JBL Flip 5
- Klipsch Nashville vs JBL Charge 2
- Klipsch Nashville vs Beats Pill 2024
- See all 104 comparisons
DBSONO X-Blast F37 eBay
Pros: 25W woofer + 10W tweeter + rear passive radiator. Bluetooth 6.0 with a 30m range and TWS stereo pairing. IPX5 water resistance. Measured bass extension of 49Hz (-10dB).
Cons: Very recessed lower mids, peaky upper mids, just not a great frequency response overall.
Full DBSONO X-Blast F37 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 35W |
|---|---|
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 49Hz |
| Battery Life | 8 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Bluetooth Version | 6.0 |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 8” x 2.5” x 3.6” (202 x 64 x 90.9 mm) |
| Drivers | 25W woofer, 10W tweeter, passive radiator |
| EQ | Yes (Bass Boost) |
| Frequency Response | 100Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| IP Rating | IPX5 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.7 lbs (771 g) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Alan Ross - The Anti Shill!: DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Bose Soundlink Flex 2 - They all want to be me 😊 More from alanrossreviews →
- Alan Ross - The Anti Shill!: DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Tribit StormBox Flow - Cheap But Cheerful? 🙈
- Alan Ross - The Anti Shill!: DBsono X-Blast F37 is warmer than the Bahamas in a heatwave!
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Sony SRS-XE300
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Ultimate Ears Boom 4
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Marshall Emberton III
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Marshall Emberton II
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Soundcore 2
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Tribit Stormbox 2
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs KEF Muo gen2
- DBSONO X-Blast F37 vs Sonos Roam 2
- See all 17 comparisons