Short answer: the Kiwi Ears Stardust. It ranks #709 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.6/5, at $77.99; the Simgot EW300 ranks #822, rated 3.5/5, and costs $79.99, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
Why pick the Kiwi Ears Stardust: The median of 12 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 69 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1.4 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: Presence sits about 5.3 dB low with an 8.1 dB dip near 5.8 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Why pick the Simgot EW300: Bass is rich and extends to 20 Hz, sitting about 2 to 3 dB above target across 24 measurements, and its tribrid design adds about 3.6 dB of upper treble air for sparkle. Watch for: Presence dips about 3 dB with a 4.8 dB low point near 6.1 kHz, and a 4.5 dB peak near 12 kHz can sound a little bright on some tracks.
Buy the Kiwi Ears Stardust. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Simgot EW300 and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 12 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 69 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 1.4 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $77.99 eBayBass is rich and extends to 20 Hz, sitting about 2 to 3 dB above target across 24 measurements, and its tribrid design adds about 3.6 dB of upper treble air for sparkle.
Amazon $79.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Kiwi Ears Stardust | Simgot EW300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $77.99 | $79.99 |
| Ranked | #709 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #822 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 6mm planar + 1 x piezoelectric |
| Impedance | 13 ohms | 28 ohms |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 40kHz | 8Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 0 lbs (20 g) | - |
| Harman Preference Score | 69 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 67 (median of 24 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.42 dB standard deviation | 2.16 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.45 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.93 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.5 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Sensitivity | - | 121 dB/Vrms |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Kiwi Ears Stardust from aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, bedrock, faxepremium, hbb, jaytiss, kazi, kuping-sensi, practiphile and superreview; the Simgot EW300 from aden, aquaphobic, bedrock, breampike, csi-zone, fahryst, fernandagunsan, filk, gadgetrytech, kazi, koi, kuping-sensi, obodio, practiphile, pw, rg, samreviews, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, suporsalad, therollo9, treblewellxtended and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Kiwi Ears Stardust compares with other leading options:
