Kefine Klean vs Tin HiFi C3 MKII

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 4.2/5 (#248 and #273 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($53.61 vs $55), so choose on features and fit.

Kefine Klean vs Tin HiFi C3 MKII

Why pick the Kefine Klean: A single 10mm dynamic driver holds an average deviation of about 1.5 dB from target in squig.link hobbyist measurements, for a preference score of 77. The catch: The treble is uneven, with a 3.7 dB peak near 8 kHz followed by a 4.4 dB dip near 9.7 kHz, which can add a little edge to sibilance while blurring cymbal decay.

The case for the Tin HiFi C3 MKII: The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.55 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: A 4.9 dB peak near 8.2 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.

Buy the Kefine Klean or the Tin HiFi C3 MKII on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Kefine Klean

A single 10mm dynamic driver holds an average deviation of about 1.5 dB from target in squig.link hobbyist measurements, for a preference score of 77.

Amazon $53.61 eBay
$53.61
Tin HiFi C3 MKII

The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.55 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.

Amazon $55.00 eBay
$55

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Kefine Klean Tin HiFi C3 MKII
Price$53.61$55.00
Ranked#248 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#273 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score77 (median of 30 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)76 (median of 11 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target1.52 dB standard deviation1.55 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.57 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.56 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.9 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.1 dB at 30 Hz)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeDynamicDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dynamic1 x 10mm dynamic
Impedance32 ohms32 ohms
Sensitivity107 dB106 dB
Weight0 lbs (10 g)0 lbs (4.1 g) per earbud
Frequency Response20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified)10Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Kefine KleanTin HiFi C3 MKIIHarman target
Frequency response of the Kefine Klean and Tin HiFi C3 MKII-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Kefine Klean from aftersound, ankramutt, atechreviews, audioamigo, awsmdanny, bassaudio, boizoff, cqtek, csi-zone, dl, ducbloke, eplv, fahryst, hbb, iemworld, jaytiss, lumerion, musicafe, obodio, practiphile, pw, regancipher, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, theaudiostore, timmyv, tonedeafmonk and treblewellxtended; the Tin HiFi C3 MKII from arn, avishai, bassaudio, csi-zone, jaytiss, pw, silicagel, soundcheck39, soundignity, tonedeafmonk and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.

How Kefine Klean compares with other leading options: