KEF R11 Meta vs Polk T50

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Short answer: the KEF R11 Meta on measured sound quality, the Polk T50 on price. The KEF R11 Meta ranks #44 of 188 floorstanding speakers, rated 4.4/5, at $6,999.98. The Polk T50 ranks #126, rated 3.8/5, at $374, $6,625.98 cheaper.

KEF R11 Meta vs Polk T50

The KEF R11 Meta is the more accurate pick. CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response with good directivity and very deep bass extension (F10 of 30Hz). Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.91 against 4.14 for the Polk T50. The tradeoff: A dip around 1-1.2kHz on-axis is attributed to a diffraction effect, and shows up as a smaller dip in the predicted in-room response.

The Polk T50 is the deeper-bass pick. Pretty deep bass for the price. Its bass reaches about 47Hz before falling 3dB, against 64Hz for the KEF R11 Meta. The tradeoff: 5dB peak at 1kHz, 4dB bright top end from 11kHz on up.

Buy the KEF R11 Meta if sound quality is the priority over the price, or the Polk T50 if the price is the priority over sound quality.

Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

KEF R11 Meta Polk T50
Price$6,999.98 per pair$374 per pair
Ranked#44 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#126 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions51”H x 12.2”W x 15.1”D (1295.4 x 309.9 x 383.5 mm)40.4”H x 9.3”W x 12.5”D (1026.2 x 235.0 x 317.5 mm)
Impedance4 ohms4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) hybrid aluminium cone woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) vented aluminium dome with MAT tweeter2x 6.5” bi-laminate paper cone woofers, 1x 1” Terylene dome tweeter + 2x 8” passive bass radiators
Sensitivity89.5dB86.3dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review)
Weight80.5 lbs (36.5 kg) each75.4 lbs (34.2 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, rearpassive radiator
Spinorama Preference Score5.914.14
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.326.15
DIY KitNoNo

More worthwhile head-to-heads for KEF R11 Meta:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

KEF R11 Meta: $6,999.98 per pair Amazon eBay

KEF R11 Meta ranking card

Older model: the KEF R11 (ranked lower, estimated 4.3/5).

Same family: the KEF R3 Meta (bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the KEF R5 Meta (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.6/5), the KEF R7 Meta (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, estimated 4.6/5), the KEF R2 Meta (smaller center, rated 4.3/5) and the KEF R6 Meta (larger center, rated 4.2/5).

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response with good directivity and very deep bass extension (F10 of 30Hz). Predicted in-room response is very smooth aside from the small 1-1.5kHz dip. The coaxial Uni-Q driver gives excellent, symmetric vertical directivity, unusual for a tower speaker. Distortion is incredibly low even down to 30Hz at 86dB SPL/1m, and stays low even at 96dB and 102dB SPL/1m: the reviewer found essentially no audible tonality change across that whole output range. Measured bass extension of 64Hz (-3dB).

Cons: A dip around 1-1.2kHz on-axis is attributed to a diffraction effect, and shows up as a smaller dip in the predicted in-room response. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±40 degrees is on the narrower side, though the transition from wide to constant directivity is smooth. Minimum impedance dips to 3.2 ohms around 580Hz, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load. 4-ohm nominal impedance overall.

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions51”H x 12.2”W x 15.1”D (1295.4 x 309.9 x 383.5 mm)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) hybrid aluminium cone woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) vented aluminium dome with MAT tweeter
Impedance4 ohms
Sensitivity89.5dB
Spinorama Preference Score5.91
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.32
Weight80.5 lbs (36.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Polk T50: $374 per pair Amazon eBay

Polk T50 ranking card

Same family: the Polk T15 (bookshelf, rated 1.9/5).

Pros: Pretty deep bass for the price. Distortion at 86dB SPL/1m is reasonably controlled outside a narrow spike around 250Hz. The reviewer notes performance is “not too bad for a budget speaker” once the two main tonal issues are addressed with EQ. Measured bass extension of 47Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.3dB.

Cons: 5dB peak at 1kHz, 4dB bright top end from 11kHz on up. Just okay vertical off axis. Impedance and phase show several resonances between 200Hz-1kHz, with a minimum impedance of 4.2 ohms. Distortion rises substantially at 96dB SPL/1m across the midrange, with repeated peaks between 100Hz-2kHz.

Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions40.4”H x 9.3”W x 12.5”D (1026.2 x 235.0 x 317.5 mm)
Drivers2x 6.5” bi-laminate paper cone woofers, 1x 1” Terylene dome tweeter + 2x 8” passive bass radiators
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity86.3dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score4.14
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.15
Weight75.4 lbs (34.2 kg)
Woofer Cabinetpassive radiator