KEF R11 Meta vs Magnepan LRS+

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Short answer: the KEF R11 Meta for better sound quality, the Magnepan LRS+ for the lower price. The KEF R11 Meta ranks #44 of 188 floorstanding speakers, rated 4.4/5, at $6,999.98. The Magnepan LRS+ ranks #149, rated 3.5/5, at $1,300, $5,699.98 cheaper.

KEF R11 Meta vs Magnepan LRS+

The KEF R11 Meta is the more accurate, deeper-bass pick. CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response with good directivity and very deep bass extension (F10 of 30Hz). Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 5.91 against 1.27 for the Magnepan LRS+. Its bass reaches about 64Hz before falling 3dB, against 74Hz for the Magnepan LRS+. The catch: A dip around 1-1.2kHz on-axis is attributed to a diffraction effect, and shows up as a smaller dip in the predicted in-room response.

What the Magnepan LRS+ does well: Thin, two-way planar-magnetic open-baffle/dipole panel design (about 48” tall, just 1” deep). Watch for: Extremely current-hungry and power-hungry: even a pair of 600W Macintosh monoblock amplifiers only averaged about 90dB output.

Buy the KEF R11 Meta if sound quality is the priority over the price, or the Magnepan LRS+ if the price is the priority over sound quality.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

KEF R11 Meta Magnepan LRS+
Price$6,999.98 per pair$1300 per pair
Ranked#44 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#149 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions51”H x 12.2”W x 15.1”D (1295.4 x 309.9 x 383.5 mm)48”H x 13.5”W x 1”D (1219.2 x 342.9 x 25.4 mm)
Impedance4 ohms4 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) hybrid aluminium cone woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) vented aluminium dome with MAT tweeterFull-range planar magnetic dipole panel (48” tall x 13.5” wide); quasi-ribbon design, two-way with separate mid/bass and tweeter ribbon sections
Sensitivity89.5dB85.1dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Weight80.5 lbs (36.5 kg) each30 lbs (13.6 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, rearopen baffle
Spinorama Preference Score5.911.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.324.32
DIY KitNoNo

How KEF R11 Meta compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

KEF R11 Meta: $6,999.98 per pair Amazon eBay

KEF R11 Meta ranking card

Older model: the KEF R11 (ranked lower, estimated 4.3/5).

Same family: the KEF R3 Meta (bookshelf, rated 4.6/5), the KEF R5 Meta (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4.6/5), the KEF R7 Meta (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, estimated 4.6/5), the KEF R2 Meta (smaller center, rated 4.3/5) and the KEF R6 Meta (larger center, rated 4.2/5).

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response with good directivity and very deep bass extension (F10 of 30Hz). Predicted in-room response is very smooth aside from the small 1-1.5kHz dip. The coaxial Uni-Q driver gives excellent, symmetric vertical directivity, unusual for a tower speaker. Distortion is incredibly low even down to 30Hz at 86dB SPL/1m, and stays low even at 96dB and 102dB SPL/1m: the reviewer found essentially no audible tonality change across that whole output range. Measured bass extension of 64Hz (-3dB).

Cons: A dip around 1-1.2kHz on-axis is attributed to a diffraction effect, and shows up as a smaller dip in the predicted in-room response. Horizontal beamwidth of about ±40 degrees is on the narrower side, though the transition from wide to constant directivity is smooth. Minimum impedance dips to 3.2 ohms around 580Hz, calling for an amplifier comfortable with a demanding load. 4-ohm nominal impedance overall.

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions51”H x 12.2”W x 15.1”D (1295.4 x 309.9 x 383.5 mm)
Drivers4 x 165 mm (6.5 in.) hybrid aluminium cone woofers, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) vented aluminium dome with MAT tweeter
Impedance4 ohms
Sensitivity89.5dB
Spinorama Preference Score5.91
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.32
Weight80.5 lbs (36.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

Magnepan LRS+: $1300 per pair Magnepan eBay

Magnepan LRS+ ranking card

Pros: Thin, two-way planar-magnetic open-baffle/dipole panel design (about 48” tall, just 1” deep). Delivers a uniquely dramatic and enveloping soundstage with genuinely three-dimensional depth effects that work across all music genres, not just classical or orchestral material as commonly assumed. Extremely tight, locked-in center-phantom imaging when set up correctly. Open-baffle design avoids the “boxy” enclosure coloration of conventional cabinet speakers. Multitone distortion is remarkably consistent from low to high frequency, a characteristic the reviewer hasn’t observed in conventional cone-and-dome speakers. Compression at high output stays modest (about 0.5-1dB) through the midrange and treble, giving roughly 20-26dB of usable dynamic range in that region. At its price, a strong contender for a dedicated secondary listening room, even if not a main-system replacement. Measured bass extension of 74Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.1dB.

Cons: Extremely current-hungry and power-hungry: even a pair of 600W Macintosh monoblock amplifiers only averaged about 90dB output. A robust, high-power amplifier is essentially mandatory, and budget amps won’t cut it. Bass rolls off very quickly (F3 74Hz, F10 67Hz, described as falling off “like a rock”), making a subwoofer an absolute requirement for any low-end content. A roughly 3dB dip in the mid-bass (100-300Hz) region thins out vocal body and fullness compared to a conventional bookshelf speaker. A resonance/bump around 400Hz adds a mild boxy quality, though it responds well to about 2dB of EQ correction. Extraordinarily fussy about exact positioning: both seating height (must align with the acoustic reference point between the panel’s lower tie-down points) and horizontal aiming are unusually critical; moving just a couple of inches can cause treble content above roughly 500-600Hz to nearly vanish. Distinct off-axis cancellation zones exist directly to the sides of the panel, where very little sound is audible at all. Fails badly under extreme dynamic-transient testing in the bass, and the reviewer blew fuses pushing the speaker during testing: not built for high-volume or highly dynamic playback. A genuinely different category from conventional hi-fi speakers, requiring more setup patience and experimentation than a typical monopole design.

Bass Extension (-10dB)67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)74Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions48”H x 13.5”W x 1”D (1219.2 x 342.9 x 25.4 mm)
DriversFull-range planar magnetic dipole panel (48” tall x 13.5” wide); quasi-ribbon design, two-way with separate mid/bass and tweeter ribbon sections
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity85.1dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score1.27
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub4.32
Weight30 lbs (13.6 kg)
Woofer Cabinetopen baffle